- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: no consensus. –
Fayenatic
London
09:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:DICOM software to Category:DICOM
- Nominator's rationale: rename to indicate more clearly that it is a topic category, not a set category. Marcocapelle ( talk) 10:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 11:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Platform fighting games to Category:Platform fighters
- Merge per nom. Platform fighter seems to be the more common term used in sources. Axem Titanium ( talk) 02:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose, is ambiguous in relation to contact sports on platform arenas, like
Lei tai.--
Mvqr (
talk)
11:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Is there evidence that such martial arts (or its practitioners) are ever called "platform fighters"? I'm not seeing any, which would suggest that there's no such ambiguity. Axem Titanium ( talk) 20:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle ( talk) 09:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle ( talk) 09:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Though the accompanying article is in dire need of a rewrite. -- Cyberlink420 ( talk) 23:44, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was:
soft merge (
non-admin closure)
Marcocapelle (
talk)
08:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Pakistani oral historians to Category:Oral historians
- Nominator's rationale: Upmerge to parent as the category has only one article ( Anam Zakaria). The parent is also not large to the point of requiring subcats (56 articles, 2 subcats including this one). Xurizuri ( talk) 05:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 10:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: The track has been renamed to Phoenix Raceway, Phoenix International Raceway hasn't been used since 2018. Nascar9919 ( talk) 05:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support, per nom. Also speedy could've been done.-- Mvqr ( talk) 15:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: procedural close, the category no longer exists (
non-admin closure)
Marcocapelle (
talk)
16:34, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Propose deleting Category:Sky Max original programming
- Nominator's rationale: I created this without realising Sky Max is just Sky One rebranded. Sky Max originals and Sky One originals are the same. My mistake. – Starklinson 22:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Procedural comment, the category page has been tagged as empty. Alternatively nominator could have tagged it as {{Db-self}}. Marcocapelle ( talk) 23:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: no consensus. –
Fayenatic
London
09:04, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:DICOM software to Category:DICOM
- Nominator's rationale: rename to indicate more clearly that it is a topic category, not a set category. Marcocapelle ( talk) 10:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 11:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Platform fighting games to Category:Platform fighters
- Merge per nom. Platform fighter seems to be the more common term used in sources. Axem Titanium ( talk) 02:01, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose, is ambiguous in relation to contact sports on platform arenas, like
Lei tai.--
Mvqr (
talk)
11:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Is there evidence that such martial arts (or its practitioners) are ever called "platform fighters"? I'm not seeing any, which would suggest that there's no such ambiguity. Axem Titanium ( talk) 20:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle ( talk) 09:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle ( talk) 09:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Though the accompanying article is in dire need of a rewrite. -- Cyberlink420 ( talk) 23:44, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was:
soft merge (
non-admin closure)
Marcocapelle (
talk)
08:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Pakistani oral historians to Category:Oral historians
- Nominator's rationale: Upmerge to parent as the category has only one article ( Anam Zakaria). The parent is also not large to the point of requiring subcats (56 articles, 2 subcats including this one). Xurizuri ( talk) 05:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 10:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: The track has been renamed to Phoenix Raceway, Phoenix International Raceway hasn't been used since 2018. Nascar9919 ( talk) 05:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support, per nom. Also speedy could've been done.-- Mvqr ( talk) 15:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: procedural close, the category no longer exists (
non-admin closure)
Marcocapelle (
talk)
16:34, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Propose deleting Category:Sky Max original programming
- Nominator's rationale: I created this without realising Sky Max is just Sky One rebranded. Sky Max originals and Sky One originals are the same. My mistake. – Starklinson 22:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Procedural comment, the category page has been tagged as empty. Alternatively nominator could have tagged it as {{Db-self}}. Marcocapelle ( talk) 23:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.