The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Anna Lesko
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: With only an article for one song and a discography page, this is an unnecessary eponymous category per
WP:OCEPON. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me17:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:2021 storming of the United States Capitol
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Aspirational Districts in India
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, there would be no objection against this category if it would contain articles about the program, but it is not defining for the districts.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
16:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:HSA Foundation members
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Techstars alumni
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Techstars is a micro financing business incubator based in Colorado Springs, US that gives startups between $6,000 to $18,000 along with training. Techstars has supported over 1,600 companies according to that article and this category contains 5 of them. 4 of these mention this funding in passing while
just 1 goes into more detail which is a weak basis for a category since these companies obviously received other funding sources and other sources of guidance. The current category contents are already listified right
here in the main article for any reader intersted in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
01:37, 28 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lists of awards received by Puerto Rican musician
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support and upgrade to speedy revert. I don't even understand why this category was moved away from "musicians" to begin with in a somewhat recentish speedy nom, and any other categories moved on a similar bizarre "consistency" argument should also be reverted (that can't even easily be found because there was no nomination page). Sure, "awards received by Aerosmith" is referring to a singular band, but this category is not, so it should be "musicians".
SnowFire (
talk)
03:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep, these are list articles each for a single particular person, it should be singular. "By" is not part of "received by" but "category sorted by".
Marcocapelle (
talk)
07:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment. I already voiced my disagreement above. At one point when researching this, I found the original move CFD that set up at least some of these moves, and only one other person commented! This does not deserve very much deference and just needs more eyes, and there's no need to be consistent with an old mistake. "List of awards by musician" in a supercat, fine. However, all of the subcats should be back where they started using the plural. Move them all - it reads crazy and wrong as is, even if "consistent" or grammatical via an unintuitive reading. Don't make people have to make that leap when the plural form is accurate and idiomatic.
SnowFire (
talk)
15:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Anna Lesko
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: With only an article for one song and a discography page, this is an unnecessary eponymous category per
WP:OCEPON. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me17:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:2021 storming of the United States Capitol
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Aspirational Districts in India
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, there would be no objection against this category if it would contain articles about the program, but it is not defining for the districts.
Marcocapelle (
talk)
16:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:HSA Foundation members
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Techstars alumni
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Techstars is a micro financing business incubator based in Colorado Springs, US that gives startups between $6,000 to $18,000 along with training. Techstars has supported over 1,600 companies according to that article and this category contains 5 of them. 4 of these mention this funding in passing while
just 1 goes into more detail which is a weak basis for a category since these companies obviously received other funding sources and other sources of guidance. The current category contents are already listified right
here in the main article for any reader intersted in the topic. -
RevelationDirect (
talk)
01:37, 28 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lists of awards received by Puerto Rican musician
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support and upgrade to speedy revert. I don't even understand why this category was moved away from "musicians" to begin with in a somewhat recentish speedy nom, and any other categories moved on a similar bizarre "consistency" argument should also be reverted (that can't even easily be found because there was no nomination page). Sure, "awards received by Aerosmith" is referring to a singular band, but this category is not, so it should be "musicians".
SnowFire (
talk)
03:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep, these are list articles each for a single particular person, it should be singular. "By" is not part of "received by" but "category sorted by".
Marcocapelle (
talk)
07:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment. I already voiced my disagreement above. At one point when researching this, I found the original move CFD that set up at least some of these moves, and only one other person commented! This does not deserve very much deference and just needs more eyes, and there's no need to be consistent with an old mistake. "List of awards by musician" in a supercat, fine. However, all of the subcats should be back where they started using the plural. Move them all - it reads crazy and wrong as is, even if "consistent" or grammatical via an unintuitive reading. Don't make people have to make that leap when the plural form is accurate and idiomatic.
SnowFire (
talk)
15:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.