- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: To make the naming consistent with other subcategories under Category:Multinational companies. Mar4d ( talk) 20:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Rename If the company has a subdivision in India and is based in another country, it is by definition multi-national, at least as most use the term. Even if a company based in Pakistan with an Indian sub-division and no other operations outside of Pakistan would not be multi-national, it just does not seem worth subdividing in such a way that we would exclude such from this category. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:19, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename to the alternative target
Category:Theatre-owning companies. Moving to the first-mentioned target would have implied a merge to an existing biographies category, that seems not to have been the intention of this discussion. (
non-admin closure)
Marcocapelle (
talk)
03:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Theatrical cartels to Category:Theatre companies
- Nominator's rationale: — swpb T 18:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- keep but rename? Looking at the members, they appear to be companies owning performance venues rather than groups putting on theatrical performances, so the proposed merger is not the right solution to a name which is misleading, to say the least. Possibly there is another category this should be merged into, but if not someone ought to come up with a better name; I'm afraid I can't come up with one off-hand. Mangoe ( talk) 13:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Suggest rename to Category:Theatre owners or Category:Theatre-owning companies. These are different from Theatrical performing companies (actors + their managers), which I suspect much of the content of the target to be. Peterkingiron ( talk) 15:45, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Rename per Peterkingiron's suggestion. A theatre company is typically representing the performers, not the owners. Dimadick ( talk) 06:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: no consensus to delete, therefore keep but purge as suggested by some. – Fayenatic London 14:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Not counting the book and template, there are only eight articles and one subcategory. This is slim for an eponymous category. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 17:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment, I'm not sure that it is too slim. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete not enough to justify an eponymous category. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep but Purge The three other biography categories aren't defined by Ms. Lange but that still leaves a viable category to aid navigation. RevelationDirect ( talk) 18:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep since sufficiently populated. gidonb ( talk) 03:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename to
Category:2014–2017 Venezuelan protests and create new parent category. @
Charles Essie and
Marcocapelle: you may wish to assist. –
Fayenatic
London
14:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:2014–17 Venezuelan protests to Category:Crisis in Venezuela (2012–present)
- Nominator's rationale: Crisis in Venezuela (2012–present) is the main article. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- 2014–17 Venezuelan protests is the main article of the category as is. Having said that, it is probably a better idea to try merging the two articles and if that succeeds come back here for renaming and expanding the scope of this category. Marcocapelle ( talk) 19:48, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
That works for me. Charles Essie ( talk) 22:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Create the new Category:Crisis in Venezuela (2012–present) and leave Category:2014–17 Venezuelan protests as the subcategory. 185.59.158.22 ( talk) 15:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ Marcocapelle: I guess I didn't phase it properly. What I meant to is the crisis is the main topic because the protests are part of the crisis (as the latter's infobox states). That's why I proposed this move. As for your merge proposal, I'm not sure how it would be done as both articles are pretty big. But, I'm certainly open to the possibility. Would you like to begin that discussion? Charles Essie ( talk) 16:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- It may not be needed after all. The alternative of 185.59.158.22 is also a good idea. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:03, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Perhaps. How do you think it should be divided? I'm not entirely sure which articles should go where. Charles Essie ( talk) 20:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Doesn't look too difficult. For example Mother of All Marches goes into protests, Shortages in Venezuela goes into crisis. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:35, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Alright, this page should still moved though. C2D per 2014–2017 Venezuelan protests. Charles Essie ( talk) 02:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ 185.59.158.22 and Marcocapelle: So, do we have an agreement? Charles Essie ( talk) 17:15, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- That's alright, I hadn't noticed the page is now at "2017" instead of at "17". Marcocapelle ( talk) 17:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ Marcocapelle: I explained in the Spanish Wikipedia the reasons why the article had to be separated in 2014 and 2017 protests before moving them. 2015 and 2016 didn't have strong wave of protests like 2014 or 2017, and the events during the former years, in my opinion, fit better in other categories, while events of the latter have unique article (Bassil da Costa and Leopoldo López for 2014 and the attacks of the Assembly and the Supreme Tribunal for 2017, for instance. My recommendation is to create the categories Category:2014 Venezuelan protests and Category:2017 Venezuelan protests, since 2014-17 is misleading, although Category:Crisis in Venezuela (2012–present) as a main article sounds alright. -- Jamez42 ( talk) 21:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ Jamez42: Please better start this discussion at article level, to split 2014–2017 Venezuelan protests into two articles 2014 Venezuelan protests and 2017 Venezuelan protests. The categories will then swiftly follow. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- @
Marcocapelle: The problem is that in Spanish the article was renamed, while in the English Wikipedia a new article was created, so I think the solution would be to move any remaining content and delete the article. Any thoughts? --
Jamez42 (
talk)
21:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ Jamez42: I see what you mean, 2014 Venezuelan protests and 2017 Venezuelan protests already exist as separate articles. Then it does make sense to split the category as well per WP:C2D (provided there is sufficient content for each of the two categories) and keep them both as subcategories of a new Category:Crisis in Venezuela (2012–present). Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, do not rename category follows the main article
2014–2017 Venezuelan protests and not as suggested.
gidonb (
talk)
03:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- BTW no procedure is needed for anon's suggestion. gidonb ( talk) 03:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename, noting the outcome of a Requested Move on the main article.
Timrollpickering
22:22, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Albanian civil war of 1997 to Category:Albanian Civil War
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Albanian Civil War. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The main article is Albanian civil war of 1997. Marcocapelle ( talk) 19:50, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Proposal withdrawn- I had no idea it was moved back to that title. Charles Essie ( talk) 22:10, 1 August 2017 (UTC)- It's been moved again to Albanian Civil War. Charles Essie ( talk) 18:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Alliance for Progress and Renewal to Category:Liberal Conservative Reformers
- Propose renaming Category:Alliance for Progress and Renewal MEPs to Category:Liberal Conservative Reformers MEPs
- Propose renaming Category:Alliance for Progress and Renewal politicians to Category:Liberal Conservative Reformers politicians
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Liberal Conservative Reformers. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:ChristianUnion to Category:Christian Union (Netherlands)
- Propose renaming Category:Chairmen of the ChristianUnion to Category:Chairmen of the Christian Union (Netherlands)
- Propose renaming Category:ChristianUnion MEPs to Category:Christian Union (Netherlands) MEPs
- Propose renaming Category:ChristianUnion politicians to Category:Christian Union (Netherlands) politicians
- Propose renaming Category:Leaders of the ChristianUnion to Category:Leaders of the Christian Union (Netherlands)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Christian Union (Netherlands). Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:24, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Co-operative Party (UK) to Category:Co-operative Party
- Propose renaming Category:Co-operative Party (UK) MEPs to Category:Co-operative Party MEPs
- Propose renaming Category:Co-operative Party (UK) politicians to Category:Co-operative Party politicians
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Co-operative Party. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre). Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Conservative-liberal parties to Category:Conservative liberal parties
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Conservative liberalism. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Dersim massacre to Category:Dersim rebellion
- Propose renaming Category:People of the Dersim massacre to Category:People of the Dersim rebellion
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Dersim rebellion. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Indonesian mass killings of 1965–1966. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Jundallah to Category:Jundallah (Iran)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Jundallah (Iran). Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Communist Party of Kurdistan – Iraq. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Liberal-conservative parties to Category:Liberal conservative parties
- Propose renaming Category:Liberal-conservative parties in Argentina to Category:Liberal conservative parties in Argentina
- Propose renaming Category:Liberal-conservative parties in the Czech Republic to Category:Liberal conservative parties in the Czech Republic
- Propose renaming Category:Liberal-conservative parties in Germany to Category:Liberal conservative parties in Germany
- Propose renaming Category:Liberal-conservative parties in Poland to Category:Liberal conservative parties in Poland
- Propose renaming Category:Liberal-conservative parties in Slovakia to Category:Liberal conservative parties in Slovakia
- Nominator's rationale: Per Liberal conservatism. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Per Category:Communist organizations in Greece, Category:Communist organizations in Ukraine and Category:Communist organizations in the United States. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Nicaraguan Contras to Category:Contras
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Contras. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename (
non-admin closure).
Marcocapelle (
talk)
04:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Pink Panther animated film series to Category:The Pink Panther cartoons
- Nominator's rationale: Per List of The Pink Panther cartoons. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Rename per nom To match the main article. Dimadick ( talk) 06:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename to
Category:Politics of Transkei and merge to
Category:Political parties in South Africa. If there were previously any members other than the two political parties, they have been removed. –
Fayenatic
London
14:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Political parties in Transkei to Category:Political parties in South Africa
- Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to both parents, per WP:SMALLCAT without removing the articles from the tree of Category:Transkei. Marcocapelle ( talk) 11:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support, I forgot about the other parent. Charles Essie ( talk) 15:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Rename to Category:Politics of Transkei with much better population potential and cleanup the Category:Transkei root accordingly. Do include the 2 parties into Category:Political parties in South Africa as suggested by nominator. gidonb ( talk) 03:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Republicanism in Scotland to Category:Scottish republicanism
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Scottish republicanism. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. –
Fayenatic
London
14:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Rhodesian elections to Category:Elections in Rhodesia
- Propose renaming Category:Southern Rhodesian elections to Category:Elections in Southern Rhodesia
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Elections in Southern Rhodesia. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment They should all just be merged into Category:Elections in Zimbabwe; it's the same country. Number 5 7 11:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support rename per nom. A merge is not required, the nominated categories are in the tree of Category:Elections in Zimbabwe and that is fine. Marcocapelle ( talk) 11:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support Rename Follows the naming convention and who was allowed to vote in these earlier periods is defining enough to warrant a separate subcategory. RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:50, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Saenuri Party politicians to Category:Liberty Korea Party politicians
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Liberty Korea Party. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:30, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Serb Democratic Party (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:30, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs to Category:The Smurfs
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs books to Category:The Smurfs books
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs characters to Category:The Smurfs characters
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs films to Category:The Smurfs in film
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs music to Category:The Smurfs music
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs on television to Category:The Smurfs (TV series)
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs video games to Category:The Smurfs video games
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per The Smurfs, The Smurfs (TV series) and The Smurfs in film. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Per Social liberalism, Category:Social liberal parties and Category:Social liberal parties in the United States. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Star Wars music to Category:Music of Star Wars
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Music of Star Wars. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename (
non-admin closure).
Marcocapelle (
talk)
04:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:The Inspector animated film series to Category:The Inspector
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per The Inspector. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Rename per nom To match the main article. Dimadick ( talk) 06:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Zimbabwean general election, 2008. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: no consensus. –
Fayenatic
London
14:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Government in Austria-Hungary to Category:Government of Austria-Hungary
- Propose merging Category:Government in Nigeria to Category:Government of Nigeria
- Propose merging Category:Government in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth to Category:Government of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
- Propose merging Category:Government in Slovenia to Category:Government of Slovenia
- Propose merging Category:Government in the United States to Category:Government of the United States
- Nominator's rationale: Duplicate categories; "of" is the convention of Category:Government by country Tim! ( talk) 17:03, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- oppose for the United States These are not duplicates. Category:Government of the United States is only about the national/federal government of the US. Category:Government in the United States is a parent category of that plus it includes articles on the states' and other governments within the United States. This is clear from the categories' hatnotes Hmains ( talk) 02:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment on oppose, we can make this same distinction for every country if we wish. The question however is whether (also less experienced) editors will naturally understand this subtle difference, I have my doubts about that. Marcocapelle ( talk) 16:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure). Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Redundant to Category:Pakistani subsidiaries of foreign companies. I request that this be merged into the latter, which meets the naming conventions of other subcategories under Category:Multinational companies. Mar4d ( talk) 16:43, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Why only this category to be re-categorized only? There are same categories on Wiki for other countries too, like Category:Indian subsidiaries of foreign multinational companies, If you want to merge earlier mentioned category then you should also merge this category to same level category too. S.A.Sajid Talk 17:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ ساجد امجد ساجد: Thanks for noting this, I've opened a rename proposal here. Mar4d ( talk) 20:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support merging I'm alright with it.-- NadirAli نادر علی ( talk) 06:55, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support merging There may be a few divisions of comapnies that might not quite be multi-national by all definitions, but I see nothing gained by making such distinctions, and I am not sure there would be an agreed upon way to make such distinctions. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: keep. (Note: it now contains 4 articles.) – Fayenatic London 14:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT - unclear there is any room for growth here. — swpb T 14:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment -- The one article is reasonably well categorised, but deletion would remove it from the Category:Defunct socialist parties tree, where all articles are diffused by country. The immediate parent is a "by country" category, where the article would be out of place. Its parent is a container for country and continent subcats. Is the solution to delete the continent branch as adding little, and merge "by country" and this article there? Peterkingiron ( talk) 15:55, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- I don't see why the article can't be a direct child of Category:Defunct socialist parties, even though it would be the only one; isn't that generally what we do with pages that don't fit into a subcategory, until there are enough of them to justify a new subcategory? — swpb T 15:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose, this is part of an established scheme by country. Marcocapelle ( talk) 04:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: no consensus. – Fayenatic London 14:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT — swpb T 13:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. SMALLCAT specifically states that it does not apply to situations where a category has an accepted overall scheme of subcategorization, such as a large international umbrella category having its contents diffused by country — because Category:Coming-of-age films by country exists, any country is allowed to have one of these as soon as there's at least one article to be filed in it, and since it's a very common genre of film there is a feasible prospect of expansion. Bearcat ( talk) 15:26, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: To make the naming consistent with other subcategories under Category:Multinational companies. Mar4d ( talk) 20:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Rename If the company has a subdivision in India and is based in another country, it is by definition multi-national, at least as most use the term. Even if a company based in Pakistan with an Indian sub-division and no other operations outside of Pakistan would not be multi-national, it just does not seem worth subdividing in such a way that we would exclude such from this category. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:19, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename to the alternative target
Category:Theatre-owning companies. Moving to the first-mentioned target would have implied a merge to an existing biographies category, that seems not to have been the intention of this discussion. (
non-admin closure)
Marcocapelle (
talk)
03:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Theatrical cartels to Category:Theatre companies
- Nominator's rationale: — swpb T 18:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- keep but rename? Looking at the members, they appear to be companies owning performance venues rather than groups putting on theatrical performances, so the proposed merger is not the right solution to a name which is misleading, to say the least. Possibly there is another category this should be merged into, but if not someone ought to come up with a better name; I'm afraid I can't come up with one off-hand. Mangoe ( talk) 13:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Suggest rename to Category:Theatre owners or Category:Theatre-owning companies. These are different from Theatrical performing companies (actors + their managers), which I suspect much of the content of the target to be. Peterkingiron ( talk) 15:45, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Rename per Peterkingiron's suggestion. A theatre company is typically representing the performers, not the owners. Dimadick ( talk) 06:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: no consensus to delete, therefore keep but purge as suggested by some. – Fayenatic London 14:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Not counting the book and template, there are only eight articles and one subcategory. This is slim for an eponymous category. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 17:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment, I'm not sure that it is too slim. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete not enough to justify an eponymous category. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep but Purge The three other biography categories aren't defined by Ms. Lange but that still leaves a viable category to aid navigation. RevelationDirect ( talk) 18:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep since sufficiently populated. gidonb ( talk) 03:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename to
Category:2014–2017 Venezuelan protests and create new parent category. @
Charles Essie and
Marcocapelle: you may wish to assist. –
Fayenatic
London
14:27, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:2014–17 Venezuelan protests to Category:Crisis in Venezuela (2012–present)
- Nominator's rationale: Crisis in Venezuela (2012–present) is the main article. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- 2014–17 Venezuelan protests is the main article of the category as is. Having said that, it is probably a better idea to try merging the two articles and if that succeeds come back here for renaming and expanding the scope of this category. Marcocapelle ( talk) 19:48, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
That works for me. Charles Essie ( talk) 22:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Create the new Category:Crisis in Venezuela (2012–present) and leave Category:2014–17 Venezuelan protests as the subcategory. 185.59.158.22 ( talk) 15:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ Marcocapelle: I guess I didn't phase it properly. What I meant to is the crisis is the main topic because the protests are part of the crisis (as the latter's infobox states). That's why I proposed this move. As for your merge proposal, I'm not sure how it would be done as both articles are pretty big. But, I'm certainly open to the possibility. Would you like to begin that discussion? Charles Essie ( talk) 16:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- It may not be needed after all. The alternative of 185.59.158.22 is also a good idea. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:03, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Perhaps. How do you think it should be divided? I'm not entirely sure which articles should go where. Charles Essie ( talk) 20:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Doesn't look too difficult. For example Mother of All Marches goes into protests, Shortages in Venezuela goes into crisis. Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:35, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Alright, this page should still moved though. C2D per 2014–2017 Venezuelan protests. Charles Essie ( talk) 02:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ 185.59.158.22 and Marcocapelle: So, do we have an agreement? Charles Essie ( talk) 17:15, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- That's alright, I hadn't noticed the page is now at "2017" instead of at "17". Marcocapelle ( talk) 17:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ Marcocapelle: I explained in the Spanish Wikipedia the reasons why the article had to be separated in 2014 and 2017 protests before moving them. 2015 and 2016 didn't have strong wave of protests like 2014 or 2017, and the events during the former years, in my opinion, fit better in other categories, while events of the latter have unique article (Bassil da Costa and Leopoldo López for 2014 and the attacks of the Assembly and the Supreme Tribunal for 2017, for instance. My recommendation is to create the categories Category:2014 Venezuelan protests and Category:2017 Venezuelan protests, since 2014-17 is misleading, although Category:Crisis in Venezuela (2012–present) as a main article sounds alright. -- Jamez42 ( talk) 21:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ Jamez42: Please better start this discussion at article level, to split 2014–2017 Venezuelan protests into two articles 2014 Venezuelan protests and 2017 Venezuelan protests. The categories will then swiftly follow. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- @
Marcocapelle: The problem is that in Spanish the article was renamed, while in the English Wikipedia a new article was created, so I think the solution would be to move any remaining content and delete the article. Any thoughts? --
Jamez42 (
talk)
21:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ Jamez42: I see what you mean, 2014 Venezuelan protests and 2017 Venezuelan protests already exist as separate articles. Then it does make sense to split the category as well per WP:C2D (provided there is sufficient content for each of the two categories) and keep them both as subcategories of a new Category:Crisis in Venezuela (2012–present). Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, do not rename category follows the main article
2014–2017 Venezuelan protests and not as suggested.
gidonb (
talk)
03:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- BTW no procedure is needed for anon's suggestion. gidonb ( talk) 03:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename, noting the outcome of a Requested Move on the main article.
Timrollpickering
22:22, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Albanian civil war of 1997 to Category:Albanian Civil War
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Albanian Civil War. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The main article is Albanian civil war of 1997. Marcocapelle ( talk) 19:50, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Proposal withdrawn- I had no idea it was moved back to that title. Charles Essie ( talk) 22:10, 1 August 2017 (UTC)- It's been moved again to Albanian Civil War. Charles Essie ( talk) 18:55, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Alliance for Progress and Renewal to Category:Liberal Conservative Reformers
- Propose renaming Category:Alliance for Progress and Renewal MEPs to Category:Liberal Conservative Reformers MEPs
- Propose renaming Category:Alliance for Progress and Renewal politicians to Category:Liberal Conservative Reformers politicians
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Liberal Conservative Reformers. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:ChristianUnion to Category:Christian Union (Netherlands)
- Propose renaming Category:Chairmen of the ChristianUnion to Category:Chairmen of the Christian Union (Netherlands)
- Propose renaming Category:ChristianUnion MEPs to Category:Christian Union (Netherlands) MEPs
- Propose renaming Category:ChristianUnion politicians to Category:Christian Union (Netherlands) politicians
- Propose renaming Category:Leaders of the ChristianUnion to Category:Leaders of the Christian Union (Netherlands)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Christian Union (Netherlands). Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:24, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Co-operative Party (UK) to Category:Co-operative Party
- Propose renaming Category:Co-operative Party (UK) MEPs to Category:Co-operative Party MEPs
- Propose renaming Category:Co-operative Party (UK) politicians to Category:Co-operative Party politicians
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Co-operative Party. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre). Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Conservative-liberal parties to Category:Conservative liberal parties
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Conservative liberalism. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Dersim massacre to Category:Dersim rebellion
- Propose renaming Category:People of the Dersim massacre to Category:People of the Dersim rebellion
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Dersim rebellion. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Indonesian mass killings of 1965–1966. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Jundallah to Category:Jundallah (Iran)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Jundallah (Iran). Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Communist Party of Kurdistan – Iraq. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Liberal-conservative parties to Category:Liberal conservative parties
- Propose renaming Category:Liberal-conservative parties in Argentina to Category:Liberal conservative parties in Argentina
- Propose renaming Category:Liberal-conservative parties in the Czech Republic to Category:Liberal conservative parties in the Czech Republic
- Propose renaming Category:Liberal-conservative parties in Germany to Category:Liberal conservative parties in Germany
- Propose renaming Category:Liberal-conservative parties in Poland to Category:Liberal conservative parties in Poland
- Propose renaming Category:Liberal-conservative parties in Slovakia to Category:Liberal conservative parties in Slovakia
- Nominator's rationale: Per Liberal conservatism. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Per Category:Communist organizations in Greece, Category:Communist organizations in Ukraine and Category:Communist organizations in the United States. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Nicaraguan Contras to Category:Contras
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Contras. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename (
non-admin closure).
Marcocapelle (
talk)
04:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Pink Panther animated film series to Category:The Pink Panther cartoons
- Nominator's rationale: Per List of The Pink Panther cartoons. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Rename per nom To match the main article. Dimadick ( talk) 06:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename to
Category:Politics of Transkei and merge to
Category:Political parties in South Africa. If there were previously any members other than the two political parties, they have been removed. –
Fayenatic
London
14:32, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Political parties in Transkei to Category:Political parties in South Africa
- Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to both parents, per WP:SMALLCAT without removing the articles from the tree of Category:Transkei. Marcocapelle ( talk) 11:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support, I forgot about the other parent. Charles Essie ( talk) 15:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Rename to Category:Politics of Transkei with much better population potential and cleanup the Category:Transkei root accordingly. Do include the 2 parties into Category:Political parties in South Africa as suggested by nominator. gidonb ( talk) 03:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Republicanism in Scotland to Category:Scottish republicanism
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Scottish republicanism. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. –
Fayenatic
London
14:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Rhodesian elections to Category:Elections in Rhodesia
- Propose renaming Category:Southern Rhodesian elections to Category:Elections in Southern Rhodesia
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Elections in Southern Rhodesia. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment They should all just be merged into Category:Elections in Zimbabwe; it's the same country. Number 5 7 11:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support rename per nom. A merge is not required, the nominated categories are in the tree of Category:Elections in Zimbabwe and that is fine. Marcocapelle ( talk) 11:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support Rename Follows the naming convention and who was allowed to vote in these earlier periods is defining enough to warrant a separate subcategory. RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:50, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Saenuri Party politicians to Category:Liberty Korea Party politicians
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Liberty Korea Party. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:30, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Serb Democratic Party (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:30, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs to Category:The Smurfs
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs books to Category:The Smurfs books
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs characters to Category:The Smurfs characters
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs films to Category:The Smurfs in film
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs music to Category:The Smurfs music
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs on television to Category:The Smurfs (TV series)
- Propose renaming Category:Smurfs video games to Category:The Smurfs video games
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per The Smurfs, The Smurfs (TV series) and The Smurfs in film. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Per Social liberalism, Category:Social liberal parties and Category:Social liberal parties in the United States. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename.
Timrollpickering
22:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Star Wars music to Category:Music of Star Wars
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Music of Star Wars. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename (
non-admin closure).
Marcocapelle (
talk)
04:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:The Inspector animated film series to Category:The Inspector
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per The Inspector. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Rename per nom To match the main article. Dimadick ( talk) 06:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: Rename. Timrollpickering 22:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: C2D per Zimbabwean general election, 2008. Charles Essie ( talk) 17:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: no consensus. –
Fayenatic
London
14:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Propose merging Category:Government in Austria-Hungary to Category:Government of Austria-Hungary
- Propose merging Category:Government in Nigeria to Category:Government of Nigeria
- Propose merging Category:Government in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth to Category:Government of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
- Propose merging Category:Government in Slovenia to Category:Government of Slovenia
- Propose merging Category:Government in the United States to Category:Government of the United States
- Nominator's rationale: Duplicate categories; "of" is the convention of Category:Government by country Tim! ( talk) 17:03, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- oppose for the United States These are not duplicates. Category:Government of the United States is only about the national/federal government of the US. Category:Government in the United States is a parent category of that plus it includes articles on the states' and other governments within the United States. This is clear from the categories' hatnotes Hmains ( talk) 02:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment on oppose, we can make this same distinction for every country if we wish. The question however is whether (also less experienced) editors will naturally understand this subtle difference, I have my doubts about that. Marcocapelle ( talk) 16:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge ( non-admin closure). Marcocapelle ( talk) 20:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Redundant to Category:Pakistani subsidiaries of foreign companies. I request that this be merged into the latter, which meets the naming conventions of other subcategories under Category:Multinational companies. Mar4d ( talk) 16:43, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Why only this category to be re-categorized only? There are same categories on Wiki for other countries too, like Category:Indian subsidiaries of foreign multinational companies, If you want to merge earlier mentioned category then you should also merge this category to same level category too. S.A.Sajid Talk 17:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ ساجد امجد ساجد: Thanks for noting this, I've opened a rename proposal here. Mar4d ( talk) 20:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support merging I'm alright with it.-- NadirAli نادر علی ( talk) 06:55, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support merging There may be a few divisions of comapnies that might not quite be multi-national by all definitions, but I see nothing gained by making such distinctions, and I am not sure there would be an agreed upon way to make such distinctions. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: keep. (Note: it now contains 4 articles.) – Fayenatic London 14:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: WP:NARROWCAT - unclear there is any room for growth here. — swpb T 14:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment -- The one article is reasonably well categorised, but deletion would remove it from the Category:Defunct socialist parties tree, where all articles are diffused by country. The immediate parent is a "by country" category, where the article would be out of place. Its parent is a container for country and continent subcats. Is the solution to delete the continent branch as adding little, and merge "by country" and this article there? Peterkingiron ( talk) 15:55, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- I don't see why the article can't be a direct child of Category:Defunct socialist parties, even though it would be the only one; isn't that generally what we do with pages that don't fit into a subcategory, until there are enough of them to justify a new subcategory? — swpb T 15:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose, this is part of an established scheme by country. Marcocapelle ( talk) 04:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: no consensus. – Fayenatic London 14:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT — swpb T 13:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. SMALLCAT specifically states that it does not apply to situations where a category has an accepted overall scheme of subcategorization, such as a large international umbrella category having its contents diffused by country — because Category:Coming-of-age films by country exists, any country is allowed to have one of these as soon as there's at least one article to be filed in it, and since it's a very common genre of film there is a feasible prospect of expansion. Bearcat ( talk) 15:26, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.