The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Merge. most of the categories' works aren't really about robotics but just robots (see its subcategories). Having it named "Robots in fiction" covers both robotics and robots in fiction (alternatively the latter could be renamed to "Robots and robotics in fiction" but I don't think that's necessary).
Fixuture (
talk)
21:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from Alpha, New Jersey
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedia protected modules
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Split.
Pigsonthewing or any other template editor, let me know if I need to downgrade any protections, as I don't feel technically totally comfortable doing this.
Courcelles (
talk)
03:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. This will help identify which modules need their protection level downgraded since, in theory, the only modules that should have full protection are those that have
cascading protection. (Then, we might want to visit renaming these categories later, but for now, I support the heart of the split.)
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedia protected templates
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Split.
Pigsonthewing or any other template editor, let me know if I need to downgrade any protections, as I don't feel technically totally comfortable doing this.
Courcelles (
talk)
03:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. This will help identify which templates need their protection level downgraded since, in theory, the only templates that should have full protection are those that have
cascading protection. (Then, we might want to visit renaming these categories later, but for now, I support the heart of the split.)
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Employees of the New Mexico Legislature
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nominator. This isn't a characteristic that would normally get a person into Wikipedia in and of itself — the only person in it didn't get a Wikipedia article for that fact itself, but for something else she did 25 years later — so it's not a
WP:DEFINING characteristic on which we should be categorizing people.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Merge. most of the categories' works aren't really about robotics but just robots (see its subcategories). Having it named "Robots in fiction" covers both robotics and robots in fiction (alternatively the latter could be renamed to "Robots and robotics in fiction" but I don't think that's necessary).
Fixuture (
talk)
21:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from Alpha, New Jersey
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedia protected modules
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Split.
Pigsonthewing or any other template editor, let me know if I need to downgrade any protections, as I don't feel technically totally comfortable doing this.
Courcelles (
talk)
03:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. This will help identify which modules need their protection level downgraded since, in theory, the only modules that should have full protection are those that have
cascading protection. (Then, we might want to visit renaming these categories later, but for now, I support the heart of the split.)
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedia protected templates
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Split.
Pigsonthewing or any other template editor, let me know if I need to downgrade any protections, as I don't feel technically totally comfortable doing this.
Courcelles (
talk)
03:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. This will help identify which templates need their protection level downgraded since, in theory, the only templates that should have full protection are those that have
cascading protection. (Then, we might want to visit renaming these categories later, but for now, I support the heart of the split.)
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Employees of the New Mexico Legislature
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nominator. This isn't a characteristic that would normally get a person into Wikipedia in and of itself — the only person in it didn't get a Wikipedia article for that fact itself, but for something else she did 25 years later — so it's not a
WP:DEFINING characteristic on which we should be categorizing people.
Bearcat (
talk)
21:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.