Category:Non-free Wikipedia file size reduction requests that must be manually processed
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The first change ('Non-free Wikipedia' → 'Wikipedia non-free') is per the parent category and the second change ('that must be manually processed' → 'for manual processing') seems like a good way to shorten the title without losing precision. -- Black Falcon(
talk)23:11, 16 March 2012 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Warner Independent films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Not sure why the speedy criterion was changed as this seems the perfect example of a non-controversial move. Rename per nom.
Tim! (
talk)
07:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Works about creative works
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Upmerge There's been some dissatisfaction in the past about the "works about works" naming structure (especially from Occuli). To this end, in that we have
Category:Works about the arts I see no need for a subcat
Category:Works about creative works. Indeed, taking a look at how Stefanomione has populated them, we find Works about musical theatre and visual art not in the "creative works" cat, but in the parent. I think we can easily organize everything in the higher level category, reducing confusion, including that of the category's creator, and ridding us of one more rather clunky "x about x" cat name. (The creator has been doing some solid work of late in the "works about" area and I do not offer this nom as a major problem per his ANI, esp. as these are not recent creations).
Shawn in Montreal (
talk)
19:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Upmerge. The more we use the arts/visual arts/fine arts, and the less we use media/works, the better. Better specificity, and less ambiguity. Clarity in naming. - jc3723:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Presidents of FIS
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Rename to avoid the ambiguous acronym and to obtain a larger scope. I think the larger scope yields a category which is small but not ridiculously small (in particular, we can add
Vegard Ulvang which currently sits alone in
Category:Skiing executives) and is more likely to expand.
Pichpich (
talk)
13:37, 16 March 2012 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Toys of the YEARs categories
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Chanbara anime and manga
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Abandoned Drafts
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Pro-life movement
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
No action at this time There is
an RFC underway at this time on these articles' names which will surely affect this category, the "long discussion" is once again underway.
Mangoe (
talk)
09:54, 16 March 2012 (UTC)reply
No action at this time per Mangoe. Any decision made now is likely to be superseded by the outcome of the
the arbcom-sanctioned RFC, and having a substantive discussion here will only cause pointless wikidrama which risks contaminating the RFC. Please will the nominator withdraw this nomination? --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
01:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn Per BHG--as I pointed out in my nomination, I thought this was all done. Since it was predicated on that discussion being over, my nomination is faulty. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯
18:28, 17 March 2012 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Australian NASA facilities
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Non-free Wikipedia file size reduction requests that must be manually processed
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The first change ('Non-free Wikipedia' → 'Wikipedia non-free') is per the parent category and the second change ('that must be manually processed' → 'for manual processing') seems like a good way to shorten the title without losing precision. -- Black Falcon(
talk)23:11, 16 March 2012 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Warner Independent films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Not sure why the speedy criterion was changed as this seems the perfect example of a non-controversial move. Rename per nom.
Tim! (
talk)
07:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Works about creative works
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Upmerge There's been some dissatisfaction in the past about the "works about works" naming structure (especially from Occuli). To this end, in that we have
Category:Works about the arts I see no need for a subcat
Category:Works about creative works. Indeed, taking a look at how Stefanomione has populated them, we find Works about musical theatre and visual art not in the "creative works" cat, but in the parent. I think we can easily organize everything in the higher level category, reducing confusion, including that of the category's creator, and ridding us of one more rather clunky "x about x" cat name. (The creator has been doing some solid work of late in the "works about" area and I do not offer this nom as a major problem per his ANI, esp. as these are not recent creations).
Shawn in Montreal (
talk)
19:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Upmerge. The more we use the arts/visual arts/fine arts, and the less we use media/works, the better. Better specificity, and less ambiguity. Clarity in naming. - jc3723:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Presidents of FIS
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Rename to avoid the ambiguous acronym and to obtain a larger scope. I think the larger scope yields a category which is small but not ridiculously small (in particular, we can add
Vegard Ulvang which currently sits alone in
Category:Skiing executives) and is more likely to expand.
Pichpich (
talk)
13:37, 16 March 2012 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Toys of the YEARs categories
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Chanbara anime and manga
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Abandoned Drafts
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Pro-life movement
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
No action at this time There is
an RFC underway at this time on these articles' names which will surely affect this category, the "long discussion" is once again underway.
Mangoe (
talk)
09:54, 16 March 2012 (UTC)reply
No action at this time per Mangoe. Any decision made now is likely to be superseded by the outcome of the
the arbcom-sanctioned RFC, and having a substantive discussion here will only cause pointless wikidrama which risks contaminating the RFC. Please will the nominator withdraw this nomination? --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
01:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn Per BHG--as I pointed out in my nomination, I thought this was all done. Since it was predicated on that discussion being over, my nomination is faulty. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯
18:28, 17 March 2012 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Australian NASA facilities
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.