The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Image deletion template shortcuts
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Proposed Category Building
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's Rationale This current category on the
Category:Diamond Blade page could be expanded to include many articles, findings and resources for readers as one page entitled Diamond Grinding. I have a list of articles that discuss this technique for diamond grinding of pavement that can expand upon this topic. Currently, if you look up diamond grinding, it takes you to the Diamond Blade page with just a category for Diamond grinding of pavement - there is so much more to the topic than this two paragraph section. Please consider the building off of this category to it's own page.
Wendyfables, 16:11 22, March 2010 —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.172.221.186 (
talk)
21:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Drilling and threading
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Rename. Drilling, which is different then
Category:Drilling technology which applies to big holes in the ground, and threading are two different things. Threads are added to holes or can be added while a hole is created. I'm not sure if a rename or a split is needed. The parent categories are also interesting. I don't see these are being cutting tools, accepting that a drill bit does cut, so including the category in
Category:Cutting tools seems like over categorization. Then the only other parent is
Category:Metalworking which might be appropriate but there may be better choices and some of these tools also are used on wood. Maybe
Category:Metal cutting tools would work?
Vegaswikian (
talk)
18:58, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
I would support a split of the category to
category:Hole making and
Category:Threading (manufacturing). The main article for the threading category is
threading (manufacturing). I realize that "hole making" is not the most unambiguous title, but naming the category "drilling" or "boring" is technically mutually exclusive to the other. As a guideline, my Degarmo book groups the processes together as "hole making processes". If someone else has a better idea I'm all ears.
As for the parent cats, I don't see what's wrong with the current ones, other than a woodworking parent cat could be added. The category shouldn't be exclusively tools or processes, as both are applicable.
Don't know. But the above suggestions would at least start to better organize this area. If we don't get it perfect on the first pass I can live with that. But clearly the current situation needs changing.
Vegaswikian (
talk)
19:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Metalworking fabrication
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The current name is grammatically incorrect; metalworking is not fabricated, metal is fabricated. In order to match the article name I propose it should be moved to
category:fabrication (metal); plus the work is usually just regarded as "fabrication work".
Wizard191 (
talk)
18:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Chess films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:War on Terrorism orders of battle
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename to match main article. As this is a ongoing event it will be best to Keep for the moment. That can be reconsidered after we have had the opportunity to look back and see whether it is relevant.
Twiceuponatime (
talk)
09:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
This is a current event and we are really too close to make a proper decision on whether to keep or delete. At present it seems to be worthy of keeping; but I would prefer to wait until we have the benefit of hindsight and see where it fits into the greater picture.
Twiceuponatime (
talk)
09:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Well we can rename for now and decide over its deletion later. Or just decide if we should delete now. I was wondering whether it should be deleted myself; it only has 4 articles. --
JokerXtreme (
talk)
10:01, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Rename to match main article, and keep it for now. This is one of these subjects that will need to be revisited when we have reached a historical distance from the events- so my grandchildren will argue this one day!- but dividing these orders of battle by war seems fairly logical.
Bradjamesbrown (
talk)
06:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Books about the War on Terrorism
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:War on Terrorism
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:GeForce series mGPUs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Category only includes two redirects that both happen to direct to the category itself, i.e., this is actually a loophole.
uKER (
talk)
07:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
I just redirected
MGPU to
GeForce#mGPUs, so that'd be covered. Also, there's no reason to have the GeForce 8 series listed as mGPUs since although the line includes mGPUs, they aren't all mGPUs. --
uKER (
talk)
16:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:User categories for discussion
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sick Wid It Records albums
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose All mentions I've found of this record label capitalize their name as Sick Wid It Records, including their MySpace page.
GobonoboTC06:20, 18 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:SNK versus-series video games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
But why would they be given the "SNK" title when SNK only developed three of them while Capcom did all the rest? That makes no sense. --
Cyberlink420 (
talk)
23:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)reply
But SNK characters are only in the ones with SNK in the title whereas all of them have Capcom characters. So why do games like Marvel vs. Capcom and Tatsunoko vs Capcom get forced into the category when SNK had nothing to do with them? --
Cyberlink420 (
talk)
11:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)reply
It appears that the scope of the category is broader than that of the template. The best solution is probably to just delete the category, since there seem to be too many permutations involved to make a neat category, and the template already provides navigation between one of the many possible groupings in this area. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
12:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete per discussion above: this is too esoteric for a category. I have read this and the previous cfd and am scarcely the wiser, especially as there is no article
SNK. ('Capcom Vs. Series' is one of the least accessible category names ever seen at cfd.)
Occuli (
talk)
12:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fan club releases
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Fan clubs aren't just for musical groups or musicians, so it's not clear that this category strictly applies to musical releases. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯
09:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Suggest 'Fan club release albums' (as the 3rd or 4th one is described as such). This does seem to be a defining characteristic, mentioned immediately in each article.
Occuli (
talk)
10:18, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:British Singles
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Delete. Delete as an arbitrary grouping: it is defined as "Some of The UK's most popular and well-known singles whether it's from the past, present or future". Normally I would suggest merging to
Category:British songs, but I believe all of the articles are already appropriately categorized as songs by a particular artist, and the songs by artist categories can be in
Category:British songs.
Good Ol’factory(talk)03:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Also, what about the singles that weren't released in the chart but only on the album? If that is the case, then there are going to be so many tracks that we don't know about.
Minimac (
talk)
21:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
In principle Object -- A single is a record (traditionally vinyl) with one song on it - or rather one on each side. a record is not a song. Songs may be on albums, EPs, or singles, publihsed as sheet music or just sung (and disappearing into the ether). However, how we should construct an appropriate category tree covering this is beyond me, as I do not edit on this subject.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
16:55, 25 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Support commercializing the ability to identify well-known songs of the future. Only a downright awful businessperson couldn't make a fortune off that. However, until we get proof of
precognition, let's Delete category.
Bradjamesbrown (
talk)
07:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Palestinian-American activists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Image deletion template shortcuts
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Proposed Category Building
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's Rationale This current category on the
Category:Diamond Blade page could be expanded to include many articles, findings and resources for readers as one page entitled Diamond Grinding. I have a list of articles that discuss this technique for diamond grinding of pavement that can expand upon this topic. Currently, if you look up diamond grinding, it takes you to the Diamond Blade page with just a category for Diamond grinding of pavement - there is so much more to the topic than this two paragraph section. Please consider the building off of this category to it's own page.
Wendyfables, 16:11 22, March 2010 —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.172.221.186 (
talk)
21:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Drilling and threading
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Rename. Drilling, which is different then
Category:Drilling technology which applies to big holes in the ground, and threading are two different things. Threads are added to holes or can be added while a hole is created. I'm not sure if a rename or a split is needed. The parent categories are also interesting. I don't see these are being cutting tools, accepting that a drill bit does cut, so including the category in
Category:Cutting tools seems like over categorization. Then the only other parent is
Category:Metalworking which might be appropriate but there may be better choices and some of these tools also are used on wood. Maybe
Category:Metal cutting tools would work?
Vegaswikian (
talk)
18:58, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
I would support a split of the category to
category:Hole making and
Category:Threading (manufacturing). The main article for the threading category is
threading (manufacturing). I realize that "hole making" is not the most unambiguous title, but naming the category "drilling" or "boring" is technically mutually exclusive to the other. As a guideline, my Degarmo book groups the processes together as "hole making processes". If someone else has a better idea I'm all ears.
As for the parent cats, I don't see what's wrong with the current ones, other than a woodworking parent cat could be added. The category shouldn't be exclusively tools or processes, as both are applicable.
Don't know. But the above suggestions would at least start to better organize this area. If we don't get it perfect on the first pass I can live with that. But clearly the current situation needs changing.
Vegaswikian (
talk)
19:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Metalworking fabrication
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The current name is grammatically incorrect; metalworking is not fabricated, metal is fabricated. In order to match the article name I propose it should be moved to
category:fabrication (metal); plus the work is usually just regarded as "fabrication work".
Wizard191 (
talk)
18:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Chess films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:War on Terrorism orders of battle
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename to match main article. As this is a ongoing event it will be best to Keep for the moment. That can be reconsidered after we have had the opportunity to look back and see whether it is relevant.
Twiceuponatime (
talk)
09:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
This is a current event and we are really too close to make a proper decision on whether to keep or delete. At present it seems to be worthy of keeping; but I would prefer to wait until we have the benefit of hindsight and see where it fits into the greater picture.
Twiceuponatime (
talk)
09:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Well we can rename for now and decide over its deletion later. Or just decide if we should delete now. I was wondering whether it should be deleted myself; it only has 4 articles. --
JokerXtreme (
talk)
10:01, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Rename to match main article, and keep it for now. This is one of these subjects that will need to be revisited when we have reached a historical distance from the events- so my grandchildren will argue this one day!- but dividing these orders of battle by war seems fairly logical.
Bradjamesbrown (
talk)
06:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Books about the War on Terrorism
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:War on Terrorism
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:GeForce series mGPUs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Category only includes two redirects that both happen to direct to the category itself, i.e., this is actually a loophole.
uKER (
talk)
07:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
I just redirected
MGPU to
GeForce#mGPUs, so that'd be covered. Also, there's no reason to have the GeForce 8 series listed as mGPUs since although the line includes mGPUs, they aren't all mGPUs. --
uKER (
talk)
16:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:User categories for discussion
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sick Wid It Records albums
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose All mentions I've found of this record label capitalize their name as Sick Wid It Records, including their MySpace page.
GobonoboTC06:20, 18 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:SNK versus-series video games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
But why would they be given the "SNK" title when SNK only developed three of them while Capcom did all the rest? That makes no sense. --
Cyberlink420 (
talk)
23:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)reply
But SNK characters are only in the ones with SNK in the title whereas all of them have Capcom characters. So why do games like Marvel vs. Capcom and Tatsunoko vs Capcom get forced into the category when SNK had nothing to do with them? --
Cyberlink420 (
talk)
11:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)reply
It appears that the scope of the category is broader than that of the template. The best solution is probably to just delete the category, since there seem to be too many permutations involved to make a neat category, and the template already provides navigation between one of the many possible groupings in this area. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
12:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete per discussion above: this is too esoteric for a category. I have read this and the previous cfd and am scarcely the wiser, especially as there is no article
SNK. ('Capcom Vs. Series' is one of the least accessible category names ever seen at cfd.)
Occuli (
talk)
12:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fan club releases
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Fan clubs aren't just for musical groups or musicians, so it's not clear that this category strictly applies to musical releases. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯
09:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Suggest 'Fan club release albums' (as the 3rd or 4th one is described as such). This does seem to be a defining characteristic, mentioned immediately in each article.
Occuli (
talk)
10:18, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:British Singles
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Delete. Delete as an arbitrary grouping: it is defined as "Some of The UK's most popular and well-known singles whether it's from the past, present or future". Normally I would suggest merging to
Category:British songs, but I believe all of the articles are already appropriately categorized as songs by a particular artist, and the songs by artist categories can be in
Category:British songs.
Good Ol’factory(talk)03:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Also, what about the singles that weren't released in the chart but only on the album? If that is the case, then there are going to be so many tracks that we don't know about.
Minimac (
talk)
21:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)reply
In principle Object -- A single is a record (traditionally vinyl) with one song on it - or rather one on each side. a record is not a song. Songs may be on albums, EPs, or singles, publihsed as sheet music or just sung (and disappearing into the ether). However, how we should construct an appropriate category tree covering this is beyond me, as I do not edit on this subject.
Peterkingiron (
talk)
16:55, 25 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Support commercializing the ability to identify well-known songs of the future. Only a downright awful businessperson couldn't make a fortune off that. However, until we get proof of
precognition, let's Delete category.
Bradjamesbrown (
talk)
07:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Palestinian-American activists
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.