The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:New Zealand Wikipedians
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:KEEP (though one could argue that as an expatriate myself, I'm biased). I'll leave it to others to fix the appropriate templates that will necessarily populate this only temporarily empty category, as Debresser observes below. postdlf (talk)
03:45, 25 December 2009 (UTC)reply
It is obvious now that you have explained it, but it was not obvious
when you nominated it.
Sorry to be blunt, but I'll take the
WP:SPADE approach: deletion discussions are not a guessing or mind-reading game. If you couldn't be bothered to write a few words explaining clearly that you think that the new category is superfluous, and what you propose should be done with it, then why do you think that other editors should bother to try to second-guess your intentions --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
22:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Halophytes and salt-tolerant plants
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:BigTable implementation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename per nom. Now that it's populated (good work, Hmains!), I see no grounds for deletion, and the category name should take the plural form because there is more than one article in this list-type category. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
19:37, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:New Zealand Wikipedians
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:KEEP (though one could argue that as an expatriate myself, I'm biased). I'll leave it to others to fix the appropriate templates that will necessarily populate this only temporarily empty category, as Debresser observes below. postdlf (talk)
03:45, 25 December 2009 (UTC)reply
It is obvious now that you have explained it, but it was not obvious
when you nominated it.
Sorry to be blunt, but I'll take the
WP:SPADE approach: deletion discussions are not a guessing or mind-reading game. If you couldn't be bothered to write a few words explaining clearly that you think that the new category is superfluous, and what you propose should be done with it, then why do you think that other editors should bother to try to second-guess your intentions --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
22:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Halophytes and salt-tolerant plants
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:BigTable implementation
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename per nom. Now that it's populated (good work, Hmains!), I see no grounds for deletion, and the category name should take the plural form because there is more than one article in this list-type category. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs)
19:37, 18 December 2009 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.