The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 02:45, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Unused category that doesn't seem necessary at all. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 23:08, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Filipino films. Conscious 11:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Filipino movies to Category:Philippine films, inline with naming conventions in Category:Films by country. -- Howard the Duck | talk, 15:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 02:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Improperly formatted category with one entry; apparently useless. Paul 20:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename per nom. Conscious 09:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
fix acronym and capitalization. Paul 20:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. Conscious 09:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
These two categories appear to cover the same territory, so I'm proposing a merge to the larger, more clearly named category. - EurekaLott 20:20, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. Conscious 11:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Recently created duplicate. Merge CalJW 19:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 09:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The plural of the current category is incorrect, and should ideally be moved. Low priority.-- Nema Fakei 18:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename all. Conscious 09:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename to match the other such subcategories of Category:American university presidents, and all similarly named categories (e.g., Category:Harvard University faculty, Category:Harvard University alumni).-- Mike Selinker 17:07, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Withdrawn after cleanup -- William Allen Simpson 05:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC) reply
This category was intended for Greeks living in Macedonia. The unnecessary nationalist struggle over Macedonia has now been extended to count all the articles about the inhabitants of the ancient Kingdom of Macedon as Greek Macedonians. This ignores the ancient Greek sources, which consistently distinguish between Greeks and Macedonians; it also fails to include the ancient Greeks who did in fact live in Macedon: Aristotle, Euripedes, Eumenes of Cardia. Classification as Greek is usually, and properly, unsupported by the articles. The best solution is to move the list to the neutral name for the category, and then strain out the handful who properly belong in the original cat. Septentrionalis 17:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
A) The intentional confusion between different national groups.
B) The paradoxe of considering contemporary Greek Macedonians, such as Costas Caramanlis etc., as ancient Macedonians!
I believe that in this way the scientific and encyclopaedic integrity, accuracy and credibility of Wikipedia gets undermined. No encyclopedia respecting itself fosters confusion, partiality and inaccuracy.--
Yannismarou
14:21, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 02:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Awkwardly named, besides Category:Prophets exists, which contains suitable subcategories, too. Dr Zak 16:49, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 02:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Redundant category. It was decided last year that individual contestants should not have individual articles unless they were already noteworthy. 1 2 3 4 4 6 7 8 9 with Derek being kept because of extra, political activities. The JPS talk to me 14:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 09:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename: Similar in naming scheme to other such categories. Also, makes it clear that these are government agencies. (See also: Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 May 17#Category:United States federal boards, commissions, and committees.) — Markles 12:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. Conscious 09:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the vote at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 May 9 was opposed to merging from "in" to "of", and in any event neither category was tagged. As the consensus seemed to be in favour of "in", merge from "of" to "in". Tim! 10:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Conscious 09:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Contains only one sub-category, Category:Adelaide City players, which is already in Category:Football (soccer) players in Australia by club. It is not necessary to split Category:Football (soccer) players in Australia by club into A-League and NSL players by club, since the A-League took over from the NSL – it would be like splitting English Premiership players into English First Division players and FA Premier League players. Hope this makes sense. AlbinoMonkey ( Talk) 10:51, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Conscious 09:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Obsolete due to category Category:Football (soccer) players in Australia by club, which follows the 'standard' set in Category:Footballers by club. Failed nomination once here, before aforementioned category was created. Furthermore, the A-League is essentially the only football/soccer competition in Australia which featured notable-enough players to have their own articles, so re-classifying them into 'division' is unnecessary. AlbinoMonkey ( Talk) 10:44, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Anti Iraq War activists. Conscious 11:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
At best this category should be a list. But in general it's pretty amateurish. Deletion was apparently proposed once before a while ago with no consensus. Presumably the hope being that the category would evolve. I would say it is still pretty clumsy and a hopelessly simplistic concept.-- 67.101.66.136 02:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 02:45, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Unused category that doesn't seem necessary at all. -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 23:08, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Filipino films. Conscious 11:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Filipino movies to Category:Philippine films, inline with naming conventions in Category:Films by country. -- Howard the Duck | talk, 15:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 02:44, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Improperly formatted category with one entry; apparently useless. Paul 20:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename per nom. Conscious 09:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
fix acronym and capitalization. Paul 20:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. Conscious 09:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
These two categories appear to cover the same territory, so I'm proposing a merge to the larger, more clearly named category. - EurekaLott 20:20, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. Conscious 11:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Recently created duplicate. Merge CalJW 19:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 09:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The plural of the current category is incorrect, and should ideally be moved. Low priority.-- Nema Fakei 18:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename all. Conscious 09:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename to match the other such subcategories of Category:American university presidents, and all similarly named categories (e.g., Category:Harvard University faculty, Category:Harvard University alumni).-- Mike Selinker 17:07, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Withdrawn after cleanup -- William Allen Simpson 05:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC) reply
This category was intended for Greeks living in Macedonia. The unnecessary nationalist struggle over Macedonia has now been extended to count all the articles about the inhabitants of the ancient Kingdom of Macedon as Greek Macedonians. This ignores the ancient Greek sources, which consistently distinguish between Greeks and Macedonians; it also fails to include the ancient Greeks who did in fact live in Macedon: Aristotle, Euripedes, Eumenes of Cardia. Classification as Greek is usually, and properly, unsupported by the articles. The best solution is to move the list to the neutral name for the category, and then strain out the handful who properly belong in the original cat. Septentrionalis 17:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
A) The intentional confusion between different national groups.
B) The paradoxe of considering contemporary Greek Macedonians, such as Costas Caramanlis etc., as ancient Macedonians!
I believe that in this way the scientific and encyclopaedic integrity, accuracy and credibility of Wikipedia gets undermined. No encyclopedia respecting itself fosters confusion, partiality and inaccuracy.--
Yannismarou
14:21, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 02:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Awkwardly named, besides Category:Prophets exists, which contains suitable subcategories, too. Dr Zak 16:49, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. Vegaswikian 02:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Redundant category. It was decided last year that individual contestants should not have individual articles unless they were already noteworthy. 1 2 3 4 4 6 7 8 9 with Derek being kept because of extra, political activities. The JPS talk to me 14:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Conscious 09:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename: Similar in naming scheme to other such categories. Also, makes it clear that these are government agencies. (See also: Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 May 17#Category:United States federal boards, commissions, and committees.) — Markles 12:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. Conscious 09:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the vote at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 May 9 was opposed to merging from "in" to "of", and in any event neither category was tagged. As the consensus seemed to be in favour of "in", merge from "of" to "in". Tim! 10:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Conscious 09:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Contains only one sub-category, Category:Adelaide City players, which is already in Category:Football (soccer) players in Australia by club. It is not necessary to split Category:Football (soccer) players in Australia by club into A-League and NSL players by club, since the A-League took over from the NSL – it would be like splitting English Premiership players into English First Division players and FA Premier League players. Hope this makes sense. AlbinoMonkey ( Talk) 10:51, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Conscious 09:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Obsolete due to category Category:Football (soccer) players in Australia by club, which follows the 'standard' set in Category:Footballers by club. Failed nomination once here, before aforementioned category was created. Furthermore, the A-League is essentially the only football/soccer competition in Australia which featured notable-enough players to have their own articles, so re-classifying them into 'division' is unnecessary. AlbinoMonkey ( Talk) 10:44, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Anti Iraq War activists. Conscious 11:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply
At best this category should be a list. But in general it's pretty amateurish. Deletion was apparently proposed once before a while ago with no consensus. Presumably the hope being that the category would evolve. I would say it is still pretty clumsy and a hopelessly simplistic concept.-- 67.101.66.136 02:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC) reply