The result of the debate was delete (I was about to listify on the Dark Lord article, but found it was recently deleted). -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Dark Lords (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Maybe we should be more specific about how one qualifies as a Dark Lord. In my experience a Dark Lord is an evil dictator with sinister henchman and supernatural powers which he or she uses for the accumulation of power at the expense of others. As a category it is just as useful as the Evil Geniuses character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.241.39 ( talk • contribs)
The result of the debate was delete, and per above "Dark Lords" discussion. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Female dark lords (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
You are not allowed to distinguish by gender. Upmerge. ~
Zythe
Talk to me!
17:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
all rename Sun Microsystems products.-- Wii WIi wuu 22:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename (I'll leave a {{ category redirect}} for the Cable News Network category). -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
all rename info page name is CNN.-- Wii WIi wuu 22:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus.
the wub
"?!"
10:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
rename info page name is Schutzstaffel.-- Wii WIi wuu 22:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename all. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
All rename' as info page name is a " Queen (band)".-- Lyjyuwin 20:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Mairi 04:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Clumsy fictional characters (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Trivial, non-defining characteristic. ~
Zythe
Talk to me!
17:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Proposing name change to match this category's peers at Category:Native American tribes by state. - TexasAndroid 17:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Proposing name change to match this category's peers at Category:Native American tribes by state. - TexasAndroid 17:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus.
the wub
"?!"
10:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Basically, these amount to subcategorizing
Category:Shoot 'em ups based on whether or not the game has a scrolling screen. I don't consider that a particularly useful categorization. We don't subcat platformers or puzzle games by scrolling either. (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
To resolve this conflict, I assume that Radiant) would be somewhat agreed, the categories must be somehow combined. It seems like the "fixed shooters" would also fit under scrolling shooters in the idea that the enemies are scrolling; although fixed shooters seem much different than scrolling shooters; since scrolling shooters tend to vary in landscape whereas fixed shooters are of course more statically based. Sidescrolling and vertical shooters should of course be categorized under one, since like as said before some games have both; I just wanted to throw out another game that does this, Legendary Wings.-- Notmyhandle 09:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus.
the wub
"?!"
10:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Merge into
Category:Computer and video card games. The term "card battle" is poorly defined; for instance, is "Magic the Gathering" a card game or a card battle game? (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus.
the wub
"?!"
10:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
I fail to see why we should categorize card games by the country they're played in or come from. Note that most of these cats are quite small, and that most content of these categories are "classic" games played with a regular deck of cards, as opposed to "recent" games by a publisher in said country. (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was merge. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Since most card games can be played by varying amounts of players (e.g. Hearts can be done by three to eight, or Blackjack can be played by two or by as many as ten), I don't see the use of this categorization. ( Radiant) 16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was reverse merge.
the wub
"?!"
10:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Upmerge to
Category:Catan as small and redundant. (
Radiant) 16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) (would have no objection to a reverse merge either) (
Radiant)
09:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus.
the wub
"?!"
10:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Apparently this refers to some computer games that have multiple parts. Given the prevalence of series and sequels, I fail to see the point. (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename to
Category:Computer and video game expansion packs.
the wub
"?!"
20:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Rename to "Computer and video game expansion packs", which is what this cat deals with. There's also expansion packs for e.g. board games and collectible train sets. (
Radiant) 16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) Jc37 has a good point; I wouldn't object to deletion either. (
Radiant)
09:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename to
Category:Interactive movie computer and video games.
the wub
"?!"
10:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
First, capit is wrong. Second, all of these are arguably adventure games of some kind. (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was keep.
the wub
"?!"
10:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
I'm not convinced of the usefulness of this, considering the wide variety of computer games that include mazes - e.g. many text adventures, platformers, 3-d shooters, etc. (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename.
the wub
"?!"
10:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Includes a bunch of subcategories. All of these should be "...computer and video games". (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn ( Radiant) 09:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I believe the prevalent term is "Real-time strategy games", or RTS. Merge to Category:Real-time strategy computer games. ( Radiant) 16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a listing of economic, infrastructure, sim or RTS games that have "tycoon" in the title. Seems pretty redundant. ( Radiant) 16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename.
the wub
"?!"
10:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Rename to "Run and gun games". Yes, they are computer games, but everything else in the parent cat (including the parent cat itself) is named "games". (
Radiant)
16:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was merge/delete. Mairi 04:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete unnecessary (and empty) category. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Sittiparus (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, this supposed
genus of
tits might be valid at the subgeneric level as a
clade of
basal Asian chickadees, or be entirely invalid. Subgenera categories are not used at present and if anything they might be justified in extremely species-rich genera (such as unsplit Parus, in which case Sittiparus would be included in Poecile however). See
Varied Tit article for references and some additional discussion.
Dysmorodrepanis
14:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was merge and redirect. Though candidacy alone may not be sufficient notability for an article, this does not affect the categorisation of articles that might exist anyway.
the wub
"?!"
12:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 18:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional tomboys (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Anime dubbed into English (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Dukes of Hazzard actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
More cruft, from the same source.
Her Pegship
07:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Charlie's Angels actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Overcategorization, cruft, not notable.
Her Pegship
07:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was merge
Category:New Zealand Māori and
Category:Māori people to
Category:New Zealand Māori people.
the wub
"?!"
11:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
A well-meaning but misguided attempt to rename
Category:Māori people. I can understand renaming to
Category:New Zealand Māori people, so as to exclude people of Māori descent not born in New Zealand (and especially given to potential confusion with people of Cook Island Māori descent), but this category does not make it clear that it is for individual people, which the previous name did (it would also have been nice if there had been some discussion about such a wide-ranging change at the New Zealand WikiProject pages, but that is beside the point). In any case, I suggest merging the two current categories into a new
Category:New Zealand Māori people, which should remove the original ambiguity and the one which has replaced it.
Grutness...
wha?
05:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was deleted by
TexasAndroid.
Whisp
e
ring
18:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedia articles vulnerable to vandalism (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
reply
Delete -- To avoid encouraging vandalism to vulnerable pages, only administrators can view
Special:Unwatchedpages, a page which performs essentially the same function as
Category:Wikipedia articles vulnerable to vandalism. There's no reason to advertise the vulnerability of an article to vandalism, thereby encouraging readers to vandalize it. The rationale for the deletion of this category is discussed in general terms in
WP:BEANS.
John254
04:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Screaming Jets DVDs (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Transferred from PROD as PROD does not and should not handle categories
132.205.93.88
03:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was keep (after problems with category text were removed). -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Internet companies of Ireland (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Transferred from PROD as PROD does not and should not handle categories
132.205.93.88
03:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 18:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge.
the wub
"?!"
19:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Military museums (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs) and
Category:War and conflict museums (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs) into
Category:Military and war museums (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!"
19:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:2000s Video Games (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, superseded by
Category:2000_computer_and_video_games
Htmlism
02:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. Mairi 04:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 17:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:1990s High Honor Video Games (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, It just seems fishy, I can't put my finger on it. I wanted to start a discussion on it. One of the guidelines for making categories said to avoid "important x's" and this seems to be a case of that.
Htmlism
01:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 17:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Robot Chicken voice actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, This information is better served by being a list.
MakeRocketGoNow
00:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 17:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Kim Possible voice actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, This information is better served by being a list.
MakeRocketGoNow
00:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete (I was about to listify on the Dark Lord article, but found it was recently deleted). -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Dark Lords (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Maybe we should be more specific about how one qualifies as a Dark Lord. In my experience a Dark Lord is an evil dictator with sinister henchman and supernatural powers which he or she uses for the accumulation of power at the expense of others. As a category it is just as useful as the Evil Geniuses character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.241.39 ( talk • contribs)
The result of the debate was delete, and per above "Dark Lords" discussion. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Female dark lords (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
You are not allowed to distinguish by gender. Upmerge. ~
Zythe
Talk to me!
17:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
all rename Sun Microsystems products.-- Wii WIi wuu 22:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename (I'll leave a {{ category redirect}} for the Cable News Network category). -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
all rename info page name is CNN.-- Wii WIi wuu 22:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus.
the wub
"?!"
10:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
rename info page name is Schutzstaffel.-- Wii WIi wuu 22:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename all. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
All rename' as info page name is a " Queen (band)".-- Lyjyuwin 20:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Mairi 04:41, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Clumsy fictional characters (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Trivial, non-defining characteristic. ~
Zythe
Talk to me!
17:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Proposing name change to match this category's peers at Category:Native American tribes by state. - TexasAndroid 17:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Proposing name change to match this category's peers at Category:Native American tribes by state. - TexasAndroid 17:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus.
the wub
"?!"
10:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Basically, these amount to subcategorizing
Category:Shoot 'em ups based on whether or not the game has a scrolling screen. I don't consider that a particularly useful categorization. We don't subcat platformers or puzzle games by scrolling either. (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
To resolve this conflict, I assume that Radiant) would be somewhat agreed, the categories must be somehow combined. It seems like the "fixed shooters" would also fit under scrolling shooters in the idea that the enemies are scrolling; although fixed shooters seem much different than scrolling shooters; since scrolling shooters tend to vary in landscape whereas fixed shooters are of course more statically based. Sidescrolling and vertical shooters should of course be categorized under one, since like as said before some games have both; I just wanted to throw out another game that does this, Legendary Wings.-- Notmyhandle 09:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus.
the wub
"?!"
10:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Merge into
Category:Computer and video card games. The term "card battle" is poorly defined; for instance, is "Magic the Gathering" a card game or a card battle game? (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus.
the wub
"?!"
10:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
I fail to see why we should categorize card games by the country they're played in or come from. Note that most of these cats are quite small, and that most content of these categories are "classic" games played with a regular deck of cards, as opposed to "recent" games by a publisher in said country. (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was merge. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Since most card games can be played by varying amounts of players (e.g. Hearts can be done by three to eight, or Blackjack can be played by two or by as many as ten), I don't see the use of this categorization. ( Radiant) 16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was reverse merge.
the wub
"?!"
10:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Upmerge to
Category:Catan as small and redundant. (
Radiant) 16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) (would have no objection to a reverse merge either) (
Radiant)
09:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus.
the wub
"?!"
10:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Apparently this refers to some computer games that have multiple parts. Given the prevalence of series and sequels, I fail to see the point. (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename to
Category:Computer and video game expansion packs.
the wub
"?!"
20:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Rename to "Computer and video game expansion packs", which is what this cat deals with. There's also expansion packs for e.g. board games and collectible train sets. (
Radiant) 16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) Jc37 has a good point; I wouldn't object to deletion either. (
Radiant)
09:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename to
Category:Interactive movie computer and video games.
the wub
"?!"
10:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
First, capit is wrong. Second, all of these are arguably adventure games of some kind. (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was keep.
the wub
"?!"
10:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
I'm not convinced of the usefulness of this, considering the wide variety of computer games that include mazes - e.g. many text adventures, platformers, 3-d shooters, etc. (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename.
the wub
"?!"
10:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Includes a bunch of subcategories. All of these should be "...computer and video games". (
Radiant)
16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn ( Radiant) 09:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I believe the prevalent term is "Real-time strategy games", or RTS. Merge to Category:Real-time strategy computer games. ( Radiant) 16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a listing of economic, infrastructure, sim or RTS games that have "tycoon" in the title. Seems pretty redundant. ( Radiant) 16:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename.
the wub
"?!"
10:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Rename to "Run and gun games". Yes, they are computer games, but everything else in the parent cat (including the parent cat itself) is named "games". (
Radiant)
16:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was merge/delete. Mairi 04:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete unnecessary (and empty) category. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Sittiparus (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, this supposed
genus of
tits might be valid at the subgeneric level as a
clade of
basal Asian chickadees, or be entirely invalid. Subgenera categories are not used at present and if anything they might be justified in extremely species-rich genera (such as unsplit Parus, in which case Sittiparus would be included in Poecile however). See
Varied Tit article for references and some additional discussion.
Dysmorodrepanis
14:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was merge and redirect. Though candidacy alone may not be sufficient notability for an article, this does not affect the categorisation of articles that might exist anyway.
the wub
"?!"
12:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 18:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional tomboys (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Anime dubbed into English (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Dukes of Hazzard actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
More cruft, from the same source.
Her Pegship
07:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Charlie's Angels actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Overcategorization, cruft, not notable.
Her Pegship
07:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was merge
Category:New Zealand Māori and
Category:Māori people to
Category:New Zealand Māori people.
the wub
"?!"
11:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
A well-meaning but misguided attempt to rename
Category:Māori people. I can understand renaming to
Category:New Zealand Māori people, so as to exclude people of Māori descent not born in New Zealand (and especially given to potential confusion with people of Cook Island Māori descent), but this category does not make it clear that it is for individual people, which the previous name did (it would also have been nice if there had been some discussion about such a wide-ranging change at the New Zealand WikiProject pages, but that is beside the point). In any case, I suggest merging the two current categories into a new
Category:New Zealand Māori people, which should remove the original ambiguity and the one which has replaced it.
Grutness...
wha?
05:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was deleted by
TexasAndroid.
Whisp
e
ring
18:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedia articles vulnerable to vandalism (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
reply
Delete -- To avoid encouraging vandalism to vulnerable pages, only administrators can view
Special:Unwatchedpages, a page which performs essentially the same function as
Category:Wikipedia articles vulnerable to vandalism. There's no reason to advertise the vulnerability of an article to vandalism, thereby encouraging readers to vandalize it. The rationale for the deletion of this category is discussed in general terms in
WP:BEANS.
John254
04:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Screaming Jets DVDs (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Transferred from PROD as PROD does not and should not handle categories
132.205.93.88
03:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was keep (after problems with category text were removed). -- RobertG ♬ talk 12:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Internet companies of Ireland (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Transferred from PROD as PROD does not and should not handle categories
132.205.93.88
03:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 18:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge.
the wub
"?!"
19:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Military museums (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs) and
Category:War and conflict museums (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs) into
Category:Military and war museums (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!"
19:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:2000s Video Games (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, superseded by
Category:2000_computer_and_video_games
Htmlism
02:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. Mairi 04:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 17:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:1990s High Honor Video Games (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, It just seems fishy, I can't put my finger on it. I wanted to start a discussion on it. One of the guidelines for making categories said to avoid "important x's" and this seems to be a case of that.
Htmlism
01:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 17:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Robot Chicken voice actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, This information is better served by being a list.
MakeRocketGoNow
00:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 17:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Kim Possible voice actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, This information is better served by being a list.
MakeRocketGoNow
00:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
reply