The result of the debate was rename to Fictional species derived from humans per below -- Syrthiss 16:22, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Misleadingly named category for fictional species. 'Rename to Category:Human-derived fictional species (suggestions for a better name would be welcome). - Sean Curtin 04:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 16:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Duplicates work already done by categorizing in Category:Living people and the politician subcategories. waffle iron 18:48, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 16:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Inherently POV and a bad precident. Do we want Category:Dead Christians and Category:Dead Jews (and which of those categories would Jesus Christ belong to?) I understand that they wanted to distinguish between dead people that remained Scientologists until death, rather that former Scientologists that died, but I don't believe that this category is the right idea. (There already is both Category:Former Scientologists and Category:Scientologists, as well as categories for death, so this becomes just a union category. JRP 16:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. Syrthiss 16:12, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
I thought this category would be for people who wrote biographies of writers, but it seems it is simply for people who produced biographies its creator considers to be of literary merit. It is point of view. Having "literary biographers" category in the first sense isn't very helpful either as a good number of people wrote biographies of both writers and non-writers. Merge into category:American biographers Bhoeble 15:19, 25 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 16:11, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Another category by Oscara, presumably intended to include Mario and Luigi. Too narrow in scope to be useful. Currently unpopulated. Pagra shtak 14:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 16:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
User:Oscara seems to be adding every Nintendo-related article that Nintendo Database has ever discussed to this category. It does not serve any purpose. Golbez 09:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 16:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The alternative word order is better I hope Hawkestone 02:29, 25 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was rename to Fictional species derived from humans per below -- Syrthiss 16:22, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Misleadingly named category for fictional species. 'Rename to Category:Human-derived fictional species (suggestions for a better name would be welcome). - Sean Curtin 04:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 16:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Duplicates work already done by categorizing in Category:Living people and the politician subcategories. waffle iron 18:48, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 16:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Inherently POV and a bad precident. Do we want Category:Dead Christians and Category:Dead Jews (and which of those categories would Jesus Christ belong to?) I understand that they wanted to distinguish between dead people that remained Scientologists until death, rather that former Scientologists that died, but I don't believe that this category is the right idea. (There already is both Category:Former Scientologists and Category:Scientologists, as well as categories for death, so this becomes just a union category. JRP 16:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. Syrthiss 16:12, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
I thought this category would be for people who wrote biographies of writers, but it seems it is simply for people who produced biographies its creator considers to be of literary merit. It is point of view. Having "literary biographers" category in the first sense isn't very helpful either as a good number of people wrote biographies of both writers and non-writers. Merge into category:American biographers Bhoeble 15:19, 25 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 16:11, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Another category by Oscara, presumably intended to include Mario and Luigi. Too narrow in scope to be useful. Currently unpopulated. Pagra shtak 14:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 16:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
User:Oscara seems to be adding every Nintendo-related article that Nintendo Database has ever discussed to this category. It does not serve any purpose. Golbez 09:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 16:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The alternative word order is better I hope Hawkestone 02:29, 25 March 2006 (UTC). reply