The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:31, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The original research this user spammed across several articles, who created this category, is going to be deleted (see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Developmental Smuggling Model (DSM)). Also, there are no articles in this category. - Centrx 23:13, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge -- Kbdank71 14:30, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Need a more suitable name for this area of economics/environment crossover. Open to suggestions, but status quo I think is not acceptable. Rd232 21:29, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Due to a reorganisation of the anatomy categories as per the wikipedia: WikiProject Preclinical Medicine. Contents moved to the hand category. PhatRita 21:13, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
68.46.186.13 decided to create this category after voting on Category:Toupee_Wearers_and_Hair_Transplants Cfd, which btw also removed the {{ Cfd}} tag from that cat. Unencyclopedic cat, I can not think of any celebs who are notable just for their hairpiece. Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 20:02, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
--- ssd 15:00, 31 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:28, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
There's only one item under this category. Since the maker is defunct, there is no potential for growth. And the Rogue_Entertainment article serves this purpose fine, with a list of all 4 products from the company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.239.215.48 ( talk • contribs) 18:47, 27 July 2005 ∞ Who ?¿? 19:57, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Chicagoland highways was created initially by me, then I realized it wasn't clear... highway can mean more things than I intended. All moved to Category:Chicago area expressways. -- Rob 17:46, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Appears to be empty, and nothing links to it, so I imagine it to be redundant. - IMSoP 16:31, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was discussion moved back to wikiproject mathematics -- Kbdank71 14:26, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Present name inappropriate, most of the articles have nothing to do with the order of the sets they discuss. Furthermore, if Odd perfect number is ever an article by itself, we will be dealing with the somewhat vacuous concept of the null set as a sequence. Septentrionalis 15:30, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 14:14, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
to fit in with all the other Cambridge colleges and just in case there is a St Catharine's College somewhere else. David | Talk 14:13, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
So if you want to propose the category for deletion, please do so, but you will have to propose all of them at the same time. They must stand or fall as a collection. This individual category is simply proposed for renaming; due to technical limitations or a decision not to have a separate Categories for Renaming other than speedy page, it just happens to be on here. If it is deleted I will recreate it under the correct name. David | Talk 08:24, 1 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 14:08, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
I would like this moved to Category:Hills of Dorset please. All the other sub-categories in Category:Mountains and hills of the United Kingdom use "of" not "in". Grinner 14:19, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was suspend per outcome of titles debate -- Kbdank71 14:05, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
This was placed in speedy by User:Vsion. Doesn't exactly follow speedy guidelines, so I'm moving it down here. -- Kbdank71 14:06, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:57, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty category that had 2 articles which belonged to Accounting category. In any case it should have not existed in the first place. Too narrow and small category. Renata3 13:53, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:04, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Capitalisation aside the name is totaly misleading, only survivors of the fire are listed. Anyway there are only two articles in the category (the main article mention 3 survivors, don't know how many thre where though) so I think it would be best to just delete and listify as "List of survivors of the General Slocum fire" (a "List of people killed in the General Slocum fire" (over 1,000 people aparently) would also make sence if anyone can find the list anywhere (the article link to a list on commons, but it's empty and up for deletion there). --
Sherool 13:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:03, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
No precedent for this sort of cat, as far as I know. Agentsoo 13:05, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 13:54, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The category was created today, but the idea behind seems nonsensical. Every second monarch should be listed in this category. What's the point? -- Ghirlandajo 10:34, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty miscapitalisation of Category:Urban studies and planning. Agentsoo 09:11, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty miscapitalisation of Category:Taiwanese writers. Agentsoo 09:03, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:49, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty cat written as an article. Already well covered in Silent Hill and related. Agentsoo 09:01, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Even the guy who started it seems to see it as just a joke. MK2 07:35, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty cat, and unnecessary; already well covered elsewhere like Category:Australian crime figures. Mobsters isn't a word often used in Australia either. -- Longhair | Talk 04:27, 27 July 2005 (UTC) 00:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was soft redirect already added -- Kbdank71 13:47, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty cat, and unnecessary; already well covered elsewhere. Agentsoo 00:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 13:37, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The only notable ones are already well catered for in Category:Motorcycle gangs. Empty cat and likely to remain so. Agentsoo 00:34, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Miscapitalisation of Indian forts. When-o-when will we have cat redirects? Agentsoo 00:20, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:25, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
This cat was being moved. All articles have now been moved so we can delete it. Agentsoo 00:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:21, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Are there any notable hills in England? I live there and can't think of any. Category is empty, unparented, and no other countries have an equivalent cat. Agentsoo 00:14, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
This is a category with one member, and the content of the member is on the category page. Not to mention the actual name/potential contents of the article itself... [[smoddy]] 21:07, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:31, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The original research this user spammed across several articles, who created this category, is going to be deleted (see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Developmental Smuggling Model (DSM)). Also, there are no articles in this category. - Centrx 23:13, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge -- Kbdank71 14:30, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Need a more suitable name for this area of economics/environment crossover. Open to suggestions, but status quo I think is not acceptable. Rd232 21:29, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Due to a reorganisation of the anatomy categories as per the wikipedia: WikiProject Preclinical Medicine. Contents moved to the hand category. PhatRita 21:13, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
68.46.186.13 decided to create this category after voting on Category:Toupee_Wearers_and_Hair_Transplants Cfd, which btw also removed the {{ Cfd}} tag from that cat. Unencyclopedic cat, I can not think of any celebs who are notable just for their hairpiece. Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 20:02, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
--- ssd 15:00, 31 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:28, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
There's only one item under this category. Since the maker is defunct, there is no potential for growth. And the Rogue_Entertainment article serves this purpose fine, with a list of all 4 products from the company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.239.215.48 ( talk • contribs) 18:47, 27 July 2005 ∞ Who ?¿? 19:57, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Chicagoland highways was created initially by me, then I realized it wasn't clear... highway can mean more things than I intended. All moved to Category:Chicago area expressways. -- Rob 17:46, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Appears to be empty, and nothing links to it, so I imagine it to be redundant. - IMSoP 16:31, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was discussion moved back to wikiproject mathematics -- Kbdank71 14:26, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Present name inappropriate, most of the articles have nothing to do with the order of the sets they discuss. Furthermore, if Odd perfect number is ever an article by itself, we will be dealing with the somewhat vacuous concept of the null set as a sequence. Septentrionalis 15:30, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 14:14, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
to fit in with all the other Cambridge colleges and just in case there is a St Catharine's College somewhere else. David | Talk 14:13, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
So if you want to propose the category for deletion, please do so, but you will have to propose all of them at the same time. They must stand or fall as a collection. This individual category is simply proposed for renaming; due to technical limitations or a decision not to have a separate Categories for Renaming other than speedy page, it just happens to be on here. If it is deleted I will recreate it under the correct name. David | Talk 08:24, 1 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 14:08, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
I would like this moved to Category:Hills of Dorset please. All the other sub-categories in Category:Mountains and hills of the United Kingdom use "of" not "in". Grinner 14:19, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was suspend per outcome of titles debate -- Kbdank71 14:05, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
This was placed in speedy by User:Vsion. Doesn't exactly follow speedy guidelines, so I'm moving it down here. -- Kbdank71 14:06, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:57, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty category that had 2 articles which belonged to Accounting category. In any case it should have not existed in the first place. Too narrow and small category. Renata3 13:53, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:04, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Capitalisation aside the name is totaly misleading, only survivors of the fire are listed. Anyway there are only two articles in the category (the main article mention 3 survivors, don't know how many thre where though) so I think it would be best to just delete and listify as "List of survivors of the General Slocum fire" (a "List of people killed in the General Slocum fire" (over 1,000 people aparently) would also make sence if anyone can find the list anywhere (the article link to a list on commons, but it's empty and up for deletion there). --
Sherool 13:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:03, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
No precedent for this sort of cat, as far as I know. Agentsoo 13:05, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 13:54, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The category was created today, but the idea behind seems nonsensical. Every second monarch should be listed in this category. What's the point? -- Ghirlandajo 10:34, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty miscapitalisation of Category:Urban studies and planning. Agentsoo 09:11, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty miscapitalisation of Category:Taiwanese writers. Agentsoo 09:03, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:49, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty cat written as an article. Already well covered in Silent Hill and related. Agentsoo 09:01, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Even the guy who started it seems to see it as just a joke. MK2 07:35, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty cat, and unnecessary; already well covered elsewhere like Category:Australian crime figures. Mobsters isn't a word often used in Australia either. -- Longhair | Talk 04:27, 27 July 2005 (UTC) 00:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was soft redirect already added -- Kbdank71 13:47, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty cat, and unnecessary; already well covered elsewhere. Agentsoo 00:45, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 13:37, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The only notable ones are already well catered for in Category:Motorcycle gangs. Empty cat and likely to remain so. Agentsoo 00:34, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Miscapitalisation of Indian forts. When-o-when will we have cat redirects? Agentsoo 00:20, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:25, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
This cat was being moved. All articles have now been moved so we can delete it. Agentsoo 00:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:21, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Are there any notable hills in England? I live there and can't think of any. Category is empty, unparented, and no other countries have an equivalent cat. Agentsoo 00:14, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC) reply
This is a category with one member, and the content of the member is on the category page. Not to mention the actual name/potential contents of the article itself... [[smoddy]] 21:07, 27 July 2005 (UTC) reply