Operator: DannyS712 ( talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 04:11, Thursday, May 23, 2019 ( UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic
Programming language(s): AWB
Source code available: AWB
Function overview: Assess unassessed articles that are part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture and are tagged as stubs as stub class
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Architecture#Stub assessment
Edit period(s): One time run
Estimated number of pages affected: 606
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: This is a follow-up to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 21, which suggested that a more limited scale would be ideal, and a follow up to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 35, which was approved to do the same for wikiproject SCOTUS for ~150 pages, showing that the logic of the bot is sound.
Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. I have a feeling this will get approved pretty easily, but just on the off chance that something's broken let's give it a trial run. Primefac ( talk) 23:03, 23 May 2019 (UTC) reply
The results of the run appear to be inconsistent. These are in minor ways, but we normally expect bot runs that will be in "automatic mode" to be consistent, can you explain why these should be different:
Thanks, — xaosflux Talk 19:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC) reply
{{(WikiProject )?Architecture}} -> {{WikiProject Architecture |class=stub}}
{{WikiProject Architecture}}
wasn't already present (meaning that the first rule did nothing,{{WikiProject Architecture ?\| ?class ?= ?(\| ?importance ?= ?)?}} -> {{WikiProject Architecture | class=stub | importance=}}
importance=
parameter, and sometimes not? Why be inconsistent here? Do you expect to have consistent whitespace going forward as well? —
xaosflux
Talk 20:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
reply
{{WikiProject Architecture|class=|importance=}}
but at least there is something to go off of. If the project wants something else that is fine as well. What do you think? —
xaosflux
Talk 21:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
reply
Operator: DannyS712 ( talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 04:11, Thursday, May 23, 2019 ( UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic
Programming language(s): AWB
Source code available: AWB
Function overview: Assess unassessed articles that are part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture and are tagged as stubs as stub class
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Architecture#Stub assessment
Edit period(s): One time run
Estimated number of pages affected: 606
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: This is a follow-up to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 21, which suggested that a more limited scale would be ideal, and a follow up to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 35, which was approved to do the same for wikiproject SCOTUS for ~150 pages, showing that the logic of the bot is sound.
Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. I have a feeling this will get approved pretty easily, but just on the off chance that something's broken let's give it a trial run. Primefac ( talk) 23:03, 23 May 2019 (UTC) reply
The results of the run appear to be inconsistent. These are in minor ways, but we normally expect bot runs that will be in "automatic mode" to be consistent, can you explain why these should be different:
Thanks, — xaosflux Talk 19:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC) reply
{{(WikiProject )?Architecture}} -> {{WikiProject Architecture |class=stub}}
{{WikiProject Architecture}}
wasn't already present (meaning that the first rule did nothing,{{WikiProject Architecture ?\| ?class ?= ?(\| ?importance ?= ?)?}} -> {{WikiProject Architecture | class=stub | importance=}}
importance=
parameter, and sometimes not? Why be inconsistent here? Do you expect to have consistent whitespace going forward as well? —
xaosflux
Talk 20:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
reply
{{WikiProject Architecture|class=|importance=}}
but at least there is something to go off of. If the project wants something else that is fine as well. What do you think? —
xaosflux
Talk 21:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
reply