Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic, unsupervised
Programming language(s): Perl
Source code available: User:AnomieBOT/source/tasks/ACNClerk.pm
Function overview: Update crosslinks on WP:ACN and WT:ACN when content is archived.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): User talk:AnomieBOT/Archive 3#ACNClerk
Edit period(s): a few times a day
Estimated number of pages affected: 2, plus their archives
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Yes
Function details: Announcements posted at WP:AC/N have a link to discussion at WT:AC/N, and those discussions have a link back to the announcement at WP:AC/N. It has been requested that AnomieBOT update these links as their targets are archived.
Seems straight-forward. Approved for trial (1 week). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. I don't know how often those discussion need archiving, so do >1 week if you need more edits. (Also I would say exclusion compliance is n/a in this case) —
HELLKNOWZ ▎
TALK 08:56, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
Trial complete.
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23] Looks good to me, except for the minor issue mentioned above and already fixed.
Anomie
⚔ 22:13, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic, unsupervised
Programming language(s): Perl
Source code available: User:AnomieBOT/source/tasks/ACNClerk.pm
Function overview: Update crosslinks on WP:ACN and WT:ACN when content is archived.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): User talk:AnomieBOT/Archive 3#ACNClerk
Edit period(s): a few times a day
Estimated number of pages affected: 2, plus their archives
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Yes
Function details: Announcements posted at WP:AC/N have a link to discussion at WT:AC/N, and those discussions have a link back to the announcement at WP:AC/N. It has been requested that AnomieBOT update these links as their targets are archived.
Seems straight-forward. Approved for trial (1 week). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. I don't know how often those discussion need archiving, so do >1 week if you need more edits. (Also I would say exclusion compliance is n/a in this case) —
HELLKNOWZ ▎
TALK 08:56, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
Trial complete.
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23] Looks good to me, except for the minor issue mentioned above and already fixed.
Anomie
⚔ 22:13, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
reply