This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.

Shortcuts WP:AUTIST WP:HONEYPOT WP:HONEYTRAP

This page in a nutshell: Editors on the autism spectrum may have different wiring patterns in their brains, but that does not mean they are stupid. Understand their differences and try to make good use of them!

Wikipedia is the ultimate honeypot! If a group of researchers had been given the task of creating a working/hobby environment specifically designed to attract autistic people, they could not have come up with anything better than Wikipedia!

As with many things, when it comes to real-world applications, autism spectrum disorder is probably best not thought of as a "disorder" or "disability", as it is really just differences in thought-processing methods. Adding the label of disorder or disability changes the way we think about things; it shifts us into the paradigm of deficiency, whereas in real terms it can be just "uncommon" or "unusual", in the same way that some hair colours, some eye colours, etc. are "uncommon" or "unusual".

The human brain has millions upon millions of nerve fibres, and connections (like switches) between those fibres. Different areas of the brain specialize in different functions. Some areas have vast amounts of wiring (or very highly active wiring), and some have more sparse (or less active) wiring.

Everybody's brain is unique. Areas where there is a greater intensity of wiring than average usually result in that person having stronger abilities – particular skills, talents, and sparks of genius – than the average person does, and areas where there is more-sparse-than-average wiring generally result in abilities a bit lower than average for those functions. This is all normal – different people are just wired differently. This helps explain why some people are much better at maths than other people, whereas others are much better at art, or sports, or subjects like history and geography – in which the learning of facts is given greater emphasis.

Our brain is a living thing. It can adapt, to a degree. If we learn new skills or practice more on existing skills, our brains will increase the intensity of the wiring and the amount of connections in the areas which deal with those skills. They're a bit like computers that can re-wire themselves and add in extra peripherals when needed. If one part of the brain gets physically damaged, the rest can often adapt (to a degree) by building new wiring pathways to circumvent that damage (with the right training and support). With this all said, natural predispositions also still exist. Some people have natural talents or are predisposed to excelling at certain tasks such that even with practice, it is not likely that everybody can learn every skill.

When using the computer metaphor ^[1] for brain structure and function, the majority of people – i.e. those who are " neurotypical" – have very intense/active wiring in the typical areas of their brains, and much more sparse/inactive wiring in other areas, as standard. That's what their "default settings" are; it's what they're born with. Autistic people, including those with Asperger's, have more sparse (or inactive) wiring in some of the areas where neurotypicals are heavily wired, and more intense (or more active) – sometimes much more intense – wiring in different areas. If the "activity" of the circuits in some areas of neurotypical brains are temporarily reduced, they temporarily perceive the world more like autistics do. ^{[2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]}

The only generalisations we can make are as follows:

• Typically, one of the areas which is less actively-wired than average, for people with autism or Asperger's, is the area dealing with innate comprehension of some social interactions, and some other functions which are processed in the same area. This means that some things just "don't come naturally" in the way that they do with neurotypical people.
• Typically, people with autism or Asperger's will have one or more things which "come naturally" to them which don't for neurotypicals; this won't be the same set of talents for all people with autism or Asperger's, as there is a lot of variety here.
• Typically, there is very often a difference in the way that language is processed, too. People with autism or Asperger's are often hard-wired to interpret things very literally and to focus on detail. They often tend to say everything that needs to be said and expect others to do so as well. That's the default setting.

This means we sometimes end up misunderstanding eachother.

Imagine three people, all listening to the same piece of music, but on different systems. One person's system has the treble turned up and the mid-range and bass turned down; one has the mid-range turned up but the treble and bass turned down; the third has the bass turned up but the mid-range and treble turned down. That's like having two autistic people and a neurotypical in the same room. It's the same piece of music they're all listening to, but it sounds completely different to each one of them, and they can't help the fact that it sounds different. They can't adjust their ears! If none of them realise that the music is balanced differently for each of them, then they're each going to end up thinking that the other two are stupid, stubborn, lazy, crazy, or whatever, for not being able to understand what they personally hear so obviously and clearly. (See also Blind men and an elephant#The story)

Once we understand these differences, it becomes easier not just to deal with them, but to make really good use of them.

People with autism or Asperger's can be capable of really intense concentration and focus on things which other people just don't find gripping. This has an up-side and a down-side.

The downside is that it can be really hard for autistic editors to drop the stick and let something go. Much, much harder than it is for neurotypicals; like having a raging thirst and being told you're not allowed to drink what's in front of you. That's not an excuse for carrying on doing that, it's just something which autistic editors need to be aware of and take special care with. Neurotypical editors should help them let go by kindly and clearly reminding them about it; maybe finding something much more interesting for them to focus on instead.

The up-side is that an autistic editor " on a mission" can be the most indefatigable researcher and fixer-of-things. At all the WikiTasks which obsessive-compulsives excel, autistic editors are also worth their weight in gold. Autistic editors can churn out, from scratch, a Featured Article-quality piece of work in just a few days if they get hooked on doing it, and if they're hooked, they can do it easily.

Autistic editors may have a phenomenal data-storage type of memory. The down-side is that memories of past tiffs and emotional baggage left over from real life can get in the way. The up-side is that once they've familiarized themselves with Wikipedia's policies, they comprehend them astoundingly well and can come up with loads of ways to explain them, which is incredibly helpful when dealing with autistic newcomers. One of the best ways for a neurotypical to train an autistic newcomer is to have a well-versed, experienced autistic contributor on hand.

Some people, whether on the autism spectrum or not, just don't belong in Wikipedia. Vandals, trolls, and abusive and disruptive editors can be blocked or banned, and being on the autism spectrum is no excuse for unacceptable behaviour.

On the other hand, some of our very best editors are on the autism spectrum, and we have some excellent autistic admins here.

In fact, it's very probable that here in Wikipedia, we have a much higher percentage of people on the autism spectrum than you might find in the general population. Wikipedia is like a honey-trap for people on the autism spectrum.

There are two sides to this:

• Neurotypical editors need to be aware that they're more likely to encounter autistic people here than they are in real life, and to know how best to work productively with them.
• People on the autism spectrum need to be aware that pulling the "Oh, but I'm a poor misunderstood person with autism or Asperger's" card out of the pack is a bad move! There are a lot of us in here, and we can tell when someone's using it as an excuse! Being on the autism spectrum does not give you carte blanche to be a jerk as well.

All editors, whether neurotypical or on the autism spectrum, need to be prepared to be creative in finding alternative ways of explaining things, remembering that thought processes which come naturally to you may very well not come naturally to the person you're talking to.

• Drawing parallels which activate different areas of the brain can work extremely well here. Relating a concept to sounds or colours (or sometimes to shapes) can make an enormous difference.
• Avoid ambiguity wherever you possibly can. People on the autism spectrum can have very literal minds and it's just as easy to pick up the wrong end of the stick as the right one, and very hard to let it go and turn it around. Be very clear; avoid phrases like "You should do ...." and use words like "do", "don't", "never", "always" instead. Some of the most common problems arise from simple good-faith misunderstanding of what the other person actually meant.
• It's always worth re-explaining something in fresh terms, and asking for an alternative explanation. Dispute resolution can be a good place to find people who can come up with a different explanation which will suddenly make things clear.
• If you're a neurotypical, don't leave things to be inferred, include them, especially if they're important! People on the autism spectrum may have real trouble understanding why you would choose to "hide" important stuff from them. If you don't say anything, they might as well assume that there is nothing more to be said.
• Avoid inserting extra meanings into what an editor on the autism spectrum says. Editors on the autism spectrum are likely to be saying exactly what they mean, and not meaning anything else.

Facts and information can be of remarkably high sentimental value for people on the autism spectrum; they're like assets that can be "owned" and "given away" at the same time. And because so many people on the autism spectrum see their own major strength as "knowing stuff" and "remembering stuff", they may be devastated to discover that something they have learned may not be true after all. It's as though they had been lied to or had something stolen from them. Bad news such as this can be very upsetting, so be gentle when disillusioning people about the accuracy of what they "know". Explain it along the lines of "more accurate stuff has been discovered since you learned that. Here is some new information that you can share." An editor on the autism spectrum who has some of their most treasured facts disproven, debunked or refuted can be as badly affected as a child who is told that there is no Santa Claus or a neurotypical who is told that their house has been burgled. This is why they can get so emotional about it. This is a very simple but very important paradigm shift; it turns you from someone who is "destroying their fact" to someone who is "giving them a better fact".

It's as powerful as the difference between saying, "I just burnt your house down!" and saying, "I just bought you a new house!"

It's super important for non-autistic people to internalise the notion that autism spectrum disorders which don't affect basic intelligence (or the appearance of it) don't cause people living with them to be "disabled" in any way. Neurotypical and autistic processing are just differences. ^[8]

Compared to neurotypicals, high-functioning autistics and Asperger's people have a "disability" only in terms of the kinds of intuitive interactions they have with others, and with language, that neurotypicals have. On the other side of the coin, and just as valid, is that neurotypicals have a "disability" compared to autistics in data handling, data storage, data processing, indexing, and rapid access. Each type has an area of dysfunctionality compared to the other type.

In the same way that autistic editors can appear (to neurotypicals) to have seriously sub-standard levels of language and interaction processes, neurotypicals may appear (to high-functioning people with Autism/Aspergers, and to autistic savants), to have almost-moronic levels of data processing. This is why we lose patience with each other so readily; it's virtually impossible for each type to be able to believe that the other type isn't being disruptive, disingenuous, or dishonest (or "disabled").

One of the best parallels is to think of the two types as two different types of computers. One type of computer has a wonderfully intuitive user interface, but comparatively lousy data-handling power. The other type has vast data-storage and data-processing powers, but a really lousy (comparatively speaking) user interface. It's a simple case of each computer type coming pre-loaded with different software; not different power. There's a huge "mythconception" amongst neurotypicals about what the autism spectrum really is. That mythconception causes so many problems for all of us, and enlightened education is the only answer to it. So, in short, please don't equate autism with disability or intellectual incompetence! Neither high-functioning autistics nor neurotypicals are "thick" compared to the others. We're just different in where our processors direct the power.

• Mentalism (discrimination)
• Category:Wikipedians with autism
• User:ThatPeskyCommoner/The Autie Pact
• User:ThatPeskyCommoner/Userboxes/APact

This user has signed the Neurotypical / Autism spectrum interaction pact.

• User:UBX/AAAwareness

This user supports Autism and Asperger's awareness.

• User Autistic rights

This user supports the rights of autistic people to speak for themselves.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Autism
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology

• "Learning each other's language" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-05-14. (The Autism Society)
• Six Rules Regarding Autistic Interactions
• Autistic workers: loyal, talented … ignored The Guardian, April 6 2012
• "Untapped Talent". National Autistic Society and Department for Work and Pensions
• 'My life as an autistic Wikipedian' by Guillaume Paumier ( Guillom)
• Neurotypical Issues