The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I really don't see the purpose of this article. This was a private individual who chose to die under Netherlands long ago passed euthanasia laws. Her death is unlikely to change anything regarding the Netherlands euthanasia policy, and thus does not pass
WP:LASTING. All coverage is about her death and thus is a
WP:BLP1E and fails
WP:NOTNEWS.
Hemiauchenia (
talk)
17:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Euthanasia in the Netherlands per nom. I agree with gidonb that the subject of this article might deserve maybe one sentence in the Euthanasia in the Netherlands article, but there's really nothing of substance to merge. In addition to the
WP:NOTNEWS aspect, there are barely any reliable news sources about ter Beek as well. –
Epicgenius (
talk)
00:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as
WP:BLP1E. No article about her in Dutch Wikipedia, and nothing about her in the
their article on Euthanasia in the Netherlands. This looks like "news" planted by the "slippery slope" campaigners against assisted dying: the Guardian says "An article about her case, published in April, was picked up by international media" (published where?) and she says herself that that coverage was "had many inaccuracies and misrepresentations ". She died, legally, end of story.
PamD09:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I really don't see the purpose of this article. This was a private individual who chose to die under Netherlands long ago passed euthanasia laws. Her death is unlikely to change anything regarding the Netherlands euthanasia policy, and thus does not pass
WP:LASTING. All coverage is about her death and thus is a
WP:BLP1E and fails
WP:NOTNEWS.
Hemiauchenia (
talk)
17:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Euthanasia in the Netherlands per nom. I agree with gidonb that the subject of this article might deserve maybe one sentence in the Euthanasia in the Netherlands article, but there's really nothing of substance to merge. In addition to the
WP:NOTNEWS aspect, there are barely any reliable news sources about ter Beek as well. –
Epicgenius (
talk)
00:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as
WP:BLP1E. No article about her in Dutch Wikipedia, and nothing about her in the
their article on Euthanasia in the Netherlands. This looks like "news" planted by the "slippery slope" campaigners against assisted dying: the Guardian says "An article about her case, published in April, was picked up by international media" (published where?) and she says herself that that coverage was "had many inaccuracies and misrepresentations ". She died, legally, end of story.
PamD09:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.