The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Zelda doesn't seem to have held any note worthiness outside of being an oddity in the city. She has no world records or any real claim to fame that withstands a worldwide notability.
Rusted AutoParts 21:20, 17 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment: How about a selective merge into
Battery Park? It looks like she (and the other turkey) have received enough coverage to where they'd merit at least a mention in the overall BP page, at the very least.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
One might equally merge into
Zelda Fitzgerald or one might develop it into some large topic about wildlife in New York. That's all ordinary editing, not deletion, and so outside the scope of this discussion.
Andrew (
talk) 09:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. Multiple New York Times and Daily News articles, including a NYT obituary, meets GNG.
Yngvadottir (
talk) 04:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep A world record is not required. The subject has been noticed and that's sufficient.
Andrew (
talk) 09:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep There are sufficient
WP:RS. A turkey can be notable by WP standards. --
Jersey92 (
talk) 21:49, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Nom has some interesting standards that don't align remotely with
notability guidelines. The turkey's death was worthy of news coverage as was her life. If it meets standards for humans, it's good enough for animals.
StarM 03:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep, as the turkey has been featured in many sources and news media. If everything with a Wikipedia article were required to have a world record or other such claim, 90% of articles would be deleted. –
Epicgenius (
talk) 02:52, 24 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Zelda doesn't seem to have held any note worthiness outside of being an oddity in the city. She has no world records or any real claim to fame that withstands a worldwide notability.
Rusted AutoParts 21:20, 17 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment: How about a selective merge into
Battery Park? It looks like she (and the other turkey) have received enough coverage to where they'd merit at least a mention in the overall BP page, at the very least.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
One might equally merge into
Zelda Fitzgerald or one might develop it into some large topic about wildlife in New York. That's all ordinary editing, not deletion, and so outside the scope of this discussion.
Andrew (
talk) 09:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. Multiple New York Times and Daily News articles, including a NYT obituary, meets GNG.
Yngvadottir (
talk) 04:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep A world record is not required. The subject has been noticed and that's sufficient.
Andrew (
talk) 09:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep There are sufficient
WP:RS. A turkey can be notable by WP standards. --
Jersey92 (
talk) 21:49, 18 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Nom has some interesting standards that don't align remotely with
notability guidelines. The turkey's death was worthy of news coverage as was her life. If it meets standards for humans, it's good enough for animals.
StarM 03:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep, as the turkey has been featured in many sources and news media. If everything with a Wikipedia article were required to have a world record or other such claim, 90% of articles would be deleted. –
Epicgenius (
talk) 02:52, 24 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.