From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Zaurs Džavadovs

Zaurs Džavadovs (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NKICK, WP:NBOX and WP:GNG Nswix ( talk) 16:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty ( talk) 17:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. The kickboxing project is not a guideline and is thus irrelevant. What matters is GNG. [1] is a primary blow-by-blow fight summary that was written by his PR rep Janis Eisaks, Red XN. [2] is another primary fight recap with little secondary content, Red XN. [3] is six sentences of mostly routine fight results, Red XN. [4] is an interview, and almost everything that isn't in quotes is still non-independent, e.g. "Džavadovs reveals" or "Džavadovs found", rather than analysis by the author, Red XN. [5] is a write-up on his wedding with an unclear amount of info provided directly from Janis Eisaks... [6] is another fight recap from Eisaks, Red XN. JoelleJay ( talk) 22:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Any WP:LOCALCONSENSUS on the Kickboxing Project is irrelevant as it cannot override community consensus on a wider scale. Alvaldi ( talk) 20:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete He's had some success as a kickboxer, but not enough to meet WP:NKICK. The other day I went through the history of Combat Press's world kickboxing rankings and did not see him mentioned once. The references seem to be routine sports results and nothing that would support a claim of meeting WP:GNG. Papaursa ( talk) 21:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Zaurs Džavadovs

Zaurs Džavadovs (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NKICK, WP:NBOX and WP:GNG Nswix ( talk) 16:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty ( talk) 17:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. The kickboxing project is not a guideline and is thus irrelevant. What matters is GNG. [1] is a primary blow-by-blow fight summary that was written by his PR rep Janis Eisaks, Red XN. [2] is another primary fight recap with little secondary content, Red XN. [3] is six sentences of mostly routine fight results, Red XN. [4] is an interview, and almost everything that isn't in quotes is still non-independent, e.g. "Džavadovs reveals" or "Džavadovs found", rather than analysis by the author, Red XN. [5] is a write-up on his wedding with an unclear amount of info provided directly from Janis Eisaks... [6] is another fight recap from Eisaks, Red XN. JoelleJay ( talk) 22:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Any WP:LOCALCONSENSUS on the Kickboxing Project is irrelevant as it cannot override community consensus on a wider scale. Alvaldi ( talk) 20:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete He's had some success as a kickboxer, but not enough to meet WP:NKICK. The other day I went through the history of Combat Press's world kickboxing rankings and did not see him mentioned once. The references seem to be routine sports results and nothing that would support a claim of meeting WP:GNG. Papaursa ( talk) 21:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook