The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
As I am not an enthusiast of martial arts sports or boxing, I cannot comment on the first two guidelines, but I would like a more detailed explanation on how this athlete of considerable national importance (in terms of Latvian sport) breaches WP:GNG.
Ivario (
talk)
09:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment I see no place where it says just competing on a WKN card shows notability. The existing notability criteria for kickboxers is
WP:NKICK. Appearing in a commercial is also not a notability criteria. I haven't done the research to make an informed vote on notability.
Papaursa (
talk)
13:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. The kickboxing project is not a guideline and is thus irrelevant. What matters is GNG.
[1] is a primary blow-by-blow fight summary that was written by his PR rep Janis Eisaks, N.
[2] is another primary fight recap with little secondary content, N.
[3] is six sentences of mostly routine fight results, N.
[4] is an interview, and almost everything that isn't in quotes is still non-independent, e.g. "Džavadovs reveals" or "Džavadovs found", rather than analysis by the author, N.
[5] is a write-up on his wedding with an unclear amount of info provided directly from Janis Eisaks...
[6] is another fight recap from Eisaks, N.
JoelleJay (
talk)
22:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete He's had some success as a kickboxer, but not enough to meet
WP:NKICK. The other day I went through the history of Combat Press's world kickboxing rankings and did not see him mentioned once. The references seem to be routine sports results and nothing that would support a claim of meeting
WP:GNG.
Papaursa (
talk)
21:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
As I am not an enthusiast of martial arts sports or boxing, I cannot comment on the first two guidelines, but I would like a more detailed explanation on how this athlete of considerable national importance (in terms of Latvian sport) breaches WP:GNG.
Ivario (
talk)
09:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment I see no place where it says just competing on a WKN card shows notability. The existing notability criteria for kickboxers is
WP:NKICK. Appearing in a commercial is also not a notability criteria. I haven't done the research to make an informed vote on notability.
Papaursa (
talk)
13:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. The kickboxing project is not a guideline and is thus irrelevant. What matters is GNG.
[1] is a primary blow-by-blow fight summary that was written by his PR rep Janis Eisaks, N.
[2] is another primary fight recap with little secondary content, N.
[3] is six sentences of mostly routine fight results, N.
[4] is an interview, and almost everything that isn't in quotes is still non-independent, e.g. "Džavadovs reveals" or "Džavadovs found", rather than analysis by the author, N.
[5] is a write-up on his wedding with an unclear amount of info provided directly from Janis Eisaks...
[6] is another fight recap from Eisaks, N.
JoelleJay (
talk)
22:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete He's had some success as a kickboxer, but not enough to meet
WP:NKICK. The other day I went through the history of Combat Press's world kickboxing rankings and did not see him mentioned once. The references seem to be routine sports results and nothing that would support a claim of meeting
WP:GNG.
Papaursa (
talk)
21:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.