The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 20 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Zac Poonen was deleted in 2006 after the first nomination, due to lack of notability. The current version, created in 2010 suffers the same problems - there are no reliable independent sources to verfiy/substantiate Poonen's notability as per Wikipedia policy. Google searches will reveal many self-published hits (books, blogs, own media), but there are very few, if any, secondary sources where independent sources are talking about him. The information in the article, therefore, cannot be properly verified and therefore also fails Wikipedia's verifiability requirements. Wikipeterproject ( talk) 00:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 20 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Zac Poonen was deleted in 2006 after the first nomination, due to lack of notability. The current version, created in 2010 suffers the same problems - there are no reliable independent sources to verfiy/substantiate Poonen's notability as per Wikipedia policy. Google searches will reveal many self-published hits (books, blogs, own media), but there are very few, if any, secondary sources where independent sources are talking about him. The information in the article, therefore, cannot be properly verified and therefore also fails Wikipedia's verifiability requirements. Wikipeterproject ( talk) 00:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC) reply