The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep, Full professor and chair with many publications including important textbooks. His books are reviewed:
[1][2].
Researcher (Hebrew: חוקרת) (
talk) 09:00, 6 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Soft Keep. Individual appears to be highly cited and meets the basic
WP:PROF guidelines, but the article needs a LOT of work, including references. If reliable, secondary sources can be identified for the information in the article, then it should stay. If not, then it should be treated as any other unsourced
WP:BLP.
nf utvol (
talk) 14:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The only references in the article are written by the subject of the article. The book reviews demonstrate notability, but this needs to be remedied as soon as possible, especially given this is a BLP.
SportingFlyerT·C 12:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep but requires improvement as stated above, because he meets notability but the article does not meet our standards
FortunateSons (
talk) 14:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Passing NAUTHOR at the very least. Also AFDISNOTCLEANUP and SNOW.
gidonb (
talk) 00:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep, Full professor and chair with many publications including important textbooks. His books are reviewed:
[1][2].
Researcher (Hebrew: חוקרת) (
talk) 09:00, 6 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Soft Keep. Individual appears to be highly cited and meets the basic
WP:PROF guidelines, but the article needs a LOT of work, including references. If reliable, secondary sources can be identified for the information in the article, then it should stay. If not, then it should be treated as any other unsourced
WP:BLP.
nf utvol (
talk) 14:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The only references in the article are written by the subject of the article. The book reviews demonstrate notability, but this needs to be remedied as soon as possible, especially given this is a BLP.
SportingFlyerT·C 12:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep but requires improvement as stated above, because he meets notability but the article does not meet our standards
FortunateSons (
talk) 14:38, 10 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Passing NAUTHOR at the very least. Also AFDISNOTCLEANUP and SNOW.
gidonb (
talk) 00:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.