- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Yazidis in Turkey
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Yazidis in Turkey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is not any source in the article about Yazidis in Turkey. About the population source, I checked it, there's nothing mentioned about Yazidis. Beshogur ( talk) 17:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Another one, I suppose.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jp× g 21:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Social science, and Turkey. jp× g 21:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. jp× g 21:53, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep; while the article's state at the time of nomination was indeed quite woeful, it has improved significantly in the intervening six years, to the point where none of the claims in the nomination would seem relevant. jp× g 21:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - nomination is stale, and there are now at least two cited sources specifically dedicated to Yazidis in Turkey, plus mention in sources about the broader Yazidi community, so it seems to meet GNG. The article still is in need of improvement, but that is not a job for AfD. Agricolae ( talk) 01:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep -- This is a legitimate article with loads of sources. Peterkingiron ( talk) 17:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Beshogur, would you be willing to take another look at the state of the article to determine if you still want it to be deleted? Thanks. ~Styyx Talk? 22:13, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Yazidis in Turkey
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Yazidis in Turkey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is not any source in the article about Yazidis in Turkey. About the population source, I checked it, there's nothing mentioned about Yazidis. Beshogur ( talk) 17:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Another one, I suppose.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jp× g 21:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Social science, and Turkey. jp× g 21:52, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. jp× g 21:53, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep; while the article's state at the time of nomination was indeed quite woeful, it has improved significantly in the intervening six years, to the point where none of the claims in the nomination would seem relevant. jp× g 21:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - nomination is stale, and there are now at least two cited sources specifically dedicated to Yazidis in Turkey, plus mention in sources about the broader Yazidi community, so it seems to meet GNG. The article still is in need of improvement, but that is not a job for AfD. Agricolae ( talk) 01:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep -- This is a legitimate article with loads of sources. Peterkingiron ( talk) 17:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- Beshogur, would you be willing to take another look at the state of the article to determine if you still want it to be deleted? Thanks. ~Styyx Talk? 22:13, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.