The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment "Why propose a deletion, when you could just jump right into the AFD process? Yes, I'm not supposed to make any more AFDs at this current moment, but seeing as someone else has already proposed a deletion, I might as well speed up the process." - (Sk8erPrince) This is because it causes more work for the admin, you also didnt speed anything up. Had you not removed the proposed deletion, this article would have been deleted on 13:19, 7 October 2016. Now because this is an AfD discussion, and lasts 7 days you extended it to October the 10th. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk)
01:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)reply
I disagree. Getting people to agree with the deletion is what I want to see. That justifies my reasons, and makes deleting the page worthwhile. It's a sense of fulfillment. --
Sk8erPrince (
talk)
01:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)reply
And might I add, that if anyone deleted your proposed deletion tag, nobody could post the same tag again? You never know who might do that. According to the
PROD page, "Any editor (including the article's creator) may object to the deletion by simply removing the tag; this action permanently cancels the proposed deletion via PROD."
That means even trolls could remove it if they so desire, leaving AFD as the only option for deletion. AFD is a much better way of handling this, so that nobody could trample with the proper deletion process. By the sounds of it, you honestly sound like you're in a hurry to get rid of this article. What's the big rush? I could wait three more days to see it get shut down, and I'm pretty sure those that were and will get involved in this AFD could make reasonable, strong points to explain why this article deserves to be deleted. --
Sk8erPrince (
talk)
03:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. Only Little Busters! is a noted role in ANN. That's about it. And the "young" version is as a supporting character. The main characters are grown up for the series.
ANN.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
01:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete For the record nobody would have contested the PROD, this article has no indication of notability. When someone contests a PROD they are expected to show sources/meet the prodder's concerns. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk)
18:03, 8 October 2016 (UTC)reply
How would you know? Trolls lurk everywhere on Wikipedia. You can't be absolutely certain. However, I am glad that you voted "Delete". --
Sk8erPrince (
talk)
00:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment "Why propose a deletion, when you could just jump right into the AFD process? Yes, I'm not supposed to make any more AFDs at this current moment, but seeing as someone else has already proposed a deletion, I might as well speed up the process." - (Sk8erPrince) This is because it causes more work for the admin, you also didnt speed anything up. Had you not removed the proposed deletion, this article would have been deleted on 13:19, 7 October 2016. Now because this is an AfD discussion, and lasts 7 days you extended it to October the 10th. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk)
01:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)reply
I disagree. Getting people to agree with the deletion is what I want to see. That justifies my reasons, and makes deleting the page worthwhile. It's a sense of fulfillment. --
Sk8erPrince (
talk)
01:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)reply
And might I add, that if anyone deleted your proposed deletion tag, nobody could post the same tag again? You never know who might do that. According to the
PROD page, "Any editor (including the article's creator) may object to the deletion by simply removing the tag; this action permanently cancels the proposed deletion via PROD."
That means even trolls could remove it if they so desire, leaving AFD as the only option for deletion. AFD is a much better way of handling this, so that nobody could trample with the proper deletion process. By the sounds of it, you honestly sound like you're in a hurry to get rid of this article. What's the big rush? I could wait three more days to see it get shut down, and I'm pretty sure those that were and will get involved in this AFD could make reasonable, strong points to explain why this article deserves to be deleted. --
Sk8erPrince (
talk)
03:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. Only Little Busters! is a noted role in ANN. That's about it. And the "young" version is as a supporting character. The main characters are grown up for the series.
ANN.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
01:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete For the record nobody would have contested the PROD, this article has no indication of notability. When someone contests a PROD they are expected to show sources/meet the prodder's concerns. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk)
18:03, 8 October 2016 (UTC)reply
How would you know? Trolls lurk everywhere on Wikipedia. You can't be absolutely certain. However, I am glad that you voted "Delete". --
Sk8erPrince (
talk)
00:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.