The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Szzuk ( talk) 13:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
I nominated this article for CSD A7 and G11, while A7 may not may clearly applicable, G11 was clearly applicable considering the amount of paid editing done on this article.
Anyway with only three sources remaining on the article, there is hardly any evidence that the person is notable. After being trimmed by many experienced editors who removed bulk loads of PR sources, what is left of this article is not even near to what should be present on wikipedia. The article has no sources, as checked by Ronz before me and I checked further to it not able to find any reliable source.
The article should be deleted for clear cut lack of notability, attempt to selfpromote the person and ToS violations. I also think the purpose of this article was simply to gain SEO ranking or advertise one self. Drewziii ( talk) 11:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Szzuk ( talk) 13:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
I nominated this article for CSD A7 and G11, while A7 may not may clearly applicable, G11 was clearly applicable considering the amount of paid editing done on this article.
Anyway with only three sources remaining on the article, there is hardly any evidence that the person is notable. After being trimmed by many experienced editors who removed bulk loads of PR sources, what is left of this article is not even near to what should be present on wikipedia. The article has no sources, as checked by Ronz before me and I checked further to it not able to find any reliable source.
The article should be deleted for clear cut lack of notability, attempt to selfpromote the person and ToS violations. I also think the purpose of this article was simply to gain SEO ranking or advertise one self. Drewziii ( talk) 11:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)