The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn and no delete votes. ( non-admin closure) Edgepedia ( talk) 19:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Reason was "Notable for
one event only, though the criticism of anti-semitism and child abuse may just allow him to pass
as inherently notable if built on and cited in
reliable sources. At present there is insufficient notability asserted and
verified in the article." This also falls foul of
WP:NOTNEWS. The article is interesting, but is it a notable person and a notable biography? What inherent notability does he have outside this series of incidents?
Fiddle
Faddle 16:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
Withdrawn. There is now sufficient new verified information in my view to justify the retention of this article.
Fiddle
Faddle 07:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn and no delete votes. ( non-admin closure) Edgepedia ( talk) 19:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Reason was "Notable for
one event only, though the criticism of anti-semitism and child abuse may just allow him to pass
as inherently notable if built on and cited in
reliable sources. At present there is insufficient notability asserted and
verified in the article." This also falls foul of
WP:NOTNEWS. The article is interesting, but is it a notable person and a notable biography? What inherent notability does he have outside this series of incidents?
Fiddle
Faddle 16:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
Withdrawn. There is now sufficient new verified information in my view to justify the retention of this article.
Fiddle
Faddle 07:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
reply