- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. So Why 10:40, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- WizG ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot find substantial coverage in reliable sources to indicate that WP:NMUSIC is met. Numerous signs point towards undeclared paid editing. SmartSE ( talk) 20:52, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I consider the 3 magazine articles reliable. This is my 1st article and i appreciate the advice on what needs to be changed. I love electronic music and this band is cool... i think that with their releases they deserve more recognition so i made them a page... appreciate suggestions. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ Music ( talk • contribs) 21:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
With music on Youtube plus with a search there are also fan made videos, counts towards notability.
I also consider this wikipedia page to be reliable! Even though WizG is an up and coming duo. I follow them deeply. They are on all music platforms to date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.37.138.194 ( talk) 19:04, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train Discuss 04:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Of the two sources in the article that are anywhere close to what we need, Music-allnew.com is a blog so not a reliable source. https://hbtmag.com/ is slightly better but it is of dubious reliability. So there's one poor source which discusses them. SmartSE ( talk) 23:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment True. And in this case, I consider the quantity of magazine reference influence the notability combined with the streaming platforms. In the end, I may vote for keeping... what could be added/subtracted to help article in the meantime? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ Music ( talk • contribs) 01:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Twitter and Instagram accounts are active and match. With music on YouTube plus the fan-made videos, their notability may be ranked for page status. Member ´Kostas´ also verified account on Twitter. EDM.com reference is from an electronic music publisher, one of the largest, adding a verifiable source for the credibility of the page. Overall, it seems the band has notability and some good references, keep the page.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. So Why 10:40, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- WizG ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot find substantial coverage in reliable sources to indicate that WP:NMUSIC is met. Numerous signs point towards undeclared paid editing. SmartSE ( talk) 20:52, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I consider the 3 magazine articles reliable. This is my 1st article and i appreciate the advice on what needs to be changed. I love electronic music and this band is cool... i think that with their releases they deserve more recognition so i made them a page... appreciate suggestions. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ Music ( talk • contribs) 21:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
With music on Youtube plus with a search there are also fan made videos, counts towards notability.
I also consider this wikipedia page to be reliable! Even though WizG is an up and coming duo. I follow them deeply. They are on all music platforms to date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.37.138.194 ( talk) 19:04, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train Discuss 04:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Of the two sources in the article that are anywhere close to what we need, Music-allnew.com is a blog so not a reliable source. https://hbtmag.com/ is slightly better but it is of dubious reliability. So there's one poor source which discusses them. SmartSE ( talk) 23:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment True. And in this case, I consider the quantity of magazine reference influence the notability combined with the streaming platforms. In the end, I may vote for keeping... what could be added/subtracted to help article in the meantime? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ Music ( talk • contribs) 01:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 02:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Twitter and Instagram accounts are active and match. With music on YouTube plus the fan-made videos, their notability may be ranked for page status. Member ´Kostas´ also verified account on Twitter. EDM.com reference is from an electronic music publisher, one of the largest, adding a verifiable source for the credibility of the page. Overall, it seems the band has notability and some good references, keep the page.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.