The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, |Uncle Milty |
talk| 20:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Merge to
windows.h. I could find no secondary sources for this Pascal language binding to the Windows API. But it exists and is verifiable, so is worth the one sentence merge into it's more notable cousin, the C binding API
windows.h. --
Mark viking (
talk) 22:36, 23 November 2013 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure that's appropriate. But I can't come up with anything better. I've been leaning toward deletion since I this the first time, but I just can't decide.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 11:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)reply
I just added a reference. But as far as I can tell, there is nothing more to say about windows.pas than the two sentences in the article. So, the topic fails the "significant coverage" test of
WP:GNG. Merging sounds like a good idea. —
Ben Kovitz (
talk) 02:32, 29 November 2013 (UTC)reply
I agree with NinjaRobotPirate that a merge to windows.h is not fitting (completely different programming languages). So maybe a Merge to Windows API is a better alternative. --
P 1 9 9✉ 18:04, 29 November 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, |Uncle Milty |
talk| 20:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)reply
Merge to
windows.h. I could find no secondary sources for this Pascal language binding to the Windows API. But it exists and is verifiable, so is worth the one sentence merge into it's more notable cousin, the C binding API
windows.h. --
Mark viking (
talk) 22:36, 23 November 2013 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure that's appropriate. But I can't come up with anything better. I've been leaning toward deletion since I this the first time, but I just can't decide.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 11:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)reply
I just added a reference. But as far as I can tell, there is nothing more to say about windows.pas than the two sentences in the article. So, the topic fails the "significant coverage" test of
WP:GNG. Merging sounds like a good idea. —
Ben Kovitz (
talk) 02:32, 29 November 2013 (UTC)reply
I agree with NinjaRobotPirate that a merge to windows.h is not fitting (completely different programming languages). So maybe a Merge to Windows API is a better alternative. --
P 1 9 9✉ 18:04, 29 November 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.