- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
William Prtic
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- William Prtic ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This should be uncontroversial. William Prtic is not a fully professional football player and he has never played in a higher division than the Swedish third tier. He is not a notable player and should not have his own page. Made an earlier attempt for a speedy deletion which for some reason was rejected. BarryHero ( talk) 08:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Sweden. Shellwood ( talk) 10:48, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. You can only PROD an article once no matter how ludicrous the DEPROD rationale is. Not being a player in a fully professional league isn't a reason for deletion anymore. He fails GNG due to a lack of significant coverage. The sources in the article are a mention in a squad list, two press releases from the sponsor of an award he won and a stats page. The Mitt I Täby source is a 404.
Dougal18 (
talk)
11:57, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- The Mitt i Täby article can be accessed through Mediearkivet, the dominating Swedish media archive. It's a 274 words long article in a local newspaper, focused on Prtic. I'd suggest you treat it like a print source. I'd say it decently verifies what it's meant to verify. It's not WP:GNG material, though. / Julle ( talk) 17:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 22:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:42, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The old NFooty would have killed this on the spot, even know this player appears in serval databases, this is still a fail. Govvy ( talk) 09:33, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I'm finding so little on this player outside the databases, I haven't even been able to confirm he exists, which is unusual for an article of an active player. (I'm sure he does, given the database sources). The PROD was apparently deleted, because the reason for the PROD didn't address any relevant criteria - but that doesn't seem very pragmatic User:Ortizesp! Nfitz ( talk) 17:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
William Prtic
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- William Prtic ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This should be uncontroversial. William Prtic is not a fully professional football player and he has never played in a higher division than the Swedish third tier. He is not a notable player and should not have his own page. Made an earlier attempt for a speedy deletion which for some reason was rejected. BarryHero ( talk) 08:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Sweden. Shellwood ( talk) 10:48, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. You can only PROD an article once no matter how ludicrous the DEPROD rationale is. Not being a player in a fully professional league isn't a reason for deletion anymore. He fails GNG due to a lack of significant coverage. The sources in the article are a mention in a squad list, two press releases from the sponsor of an award he won and a stats page. The Mitt I Täby source is a 404.
Dougal18 (
talk)
11:57, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- The Mitt i Täby article can be accessed through Mediearkivet, the dominating Swedish media archive. It's a 274 words long article in a local newspaper, focused on Prtic. I'd suggest you treat it like a print source. I'd say it decently verifies what it's meant to verify. It's not WP:GNG material, though. / Julle ( talk) 17:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 22:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:42, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The old NFooty would have killed this on the spot, even know this player appears in serval databases, this is still a fail. Govvy ( talk) 09:33, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I'm finding so little on this player outside the databases, I haven't even been able to confirm he exists, which is unusual for an article of an active player. (I'm sure he does, given the database sources). The PROD was apparently deleted, because the reason for the PROD didn't address any relevant criteria - but that doesn't seem very pragmatic User:Ortizesp! Nfitz ( talk) 17:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.