- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 08:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- William Pierrepont, Earl of Kingston-upon-Hull ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Royaltycruft. Article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO- no WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. Article makes no claim to notability. // Timothy :: talk 03:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 03:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 03:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Rich aristocratic kid who died of smallpox at age 20 without accomplishing anything other than having two kids of his own. Not notable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it
- Delete Wikipedia is not a biographical dictionary or a genealogical database. Just because your parent held a noble title, and you would have if you had not died, does not make you default notable enough for an article. We should stop doing place filler articles. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 13:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: He wasn't an Earl in his own right. Earl of Kingston was his father's subsidiary title which he was using as heir apparent. Not notable enough, even for a redirect. Fails WP:BIO. TheRedDomitor ( talk) 01:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 08:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- William Pierrepont, Earl of Kingston-upon-Hull ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Royaltycruft. Article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO- no WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. Article makes no claim to notability. // Timothy :: talk 03:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 03:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 03:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Rich aristocratic kid who died of smallpox at age 20 without accomplishing anything other than having two kids of his own. Not notable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it
- Delete Wikipedia is not a biographical dictionary or a genealogical database. Just because your parent held a noble title, and you would have if you had not died, does not make you default notable enough for an article. We should stop doing place filler articles. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 13:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: He wasn't an Earl in his own right. Earl of Kingston was his father's subsidiary title which he was using as heir apparent. Not notable enough, even for a redirect. Fails WP:BIO. TheRedDomitor ( talk) 01:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.