- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Wiji Arulampalam
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wiji Arulampalam ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet notability requirements. James Richards 19:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesrichards12345 ( talk • contribs)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. James Richards 19:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. James Richards 19:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. James Richards 19:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have added sources independent of the subject (such as Forbes and the Investors Chronicle) which mention the person and their research. These sources are reliable. Another way to assess the notability of the person is by googling their name followed by site:wikipedia.org which shows that their work is quoted in 10 other Wikipedia articles. Also, just for transparency, I do not know the person and thought they were notable enough (being an economist myself) to have a page. Happy to have other people's opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lainx ( talk • contribs) 21:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Her work has been cited thousands of times which alone is more than enough to fly by the standard of WP:PROF Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep easily passes WP:PROF. -- KartikeyaS ( talk) 06:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Notable per WP:PROF. ~ riley ( talk) 07:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per PROF and WP:HEY. Bearian ( talk) 13:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:PROF. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 15:33, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:PROF. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 20:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Wiji Arulampalam
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wiji Arulampalam ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet notability requirements. James Richards 19:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesrichards12345 ( talk • contribs)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. James Richards 19:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. James Richards 19:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. James Richards 19:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have added sources independent of the subject (such as Forbes and the Investors Chronicle) which mention the person and their research. These sources are reliable. Another way to assess the notability of the person is by googling their name followed by site:wikipedia.org which shows that their work is quoted in 10 other Wikipedia articles. Also, just for transparency, I do not know the person and thought they were notable enough (being an economist myself) to have a page. Happy to have other people's opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lainx ( talk • contribs) 21:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Her work has been cited thousands of times which alone is more than enough to fly by the standard of WP:PROF Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep easily passes WP:PROF. -- KartikeyaS ( talk) 06:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Notable per WP:PROF. ~ riley ( talk) 07:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per PROF and WP:HEY. Bearian ( talk) 13:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:PROF. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 15:33, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:PROF. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 20:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.