- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
White Writing: On the Culture of Letters in South Africa
- White Writing: On the Culture of Letters in South Africa ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
the author is a Nobelist, and any substantial work of his is notable. Even some or many individual essays might be. I do not think we should necessarily extend it to collections of essays, unless they've been as a collection the subject of critical comment that discusses the collection as such. I think that's going to be very rare, tho it can happen. DGG ( talk ) 04:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 13:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- We know the author and his work are notable. So the real question is whether this should be covered in a stand-alone article or merged into a broader article on the author's work. So Keep and determine whether merging or leaving it independent is a better choice. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 04:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, the fact that it's by Coetzee might possibly mean that this meets criteria #5 of WP:BK. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 09:51, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 09:40, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Here's 3 reviews [1] [2] [3]. It also seems to be mentioned in several other essays/papers on Coetzee. -- Colapeninsula ( talk) 10:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
White Writing: On the Culture of Letters in South Africa
- White Writing: On the Culture of Letters in South Africa ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
the author is a Nobelist, and any substantial work of his is notable. Even some or many individual essays might be. I do not think we should necessarily extend it to collections of essays, unless they've been as a collection the subject of critical comment that discusses the collection as such. I think that's going to be very rare, tho it can happen. DGG ( talk ) 04:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000 (talk) 17:13, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 13:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- We know the author and his work are notable. So the real question is whether this should be covered in a stand-alone article or merged into a broader article on the author's work. So Keep and determine whether merging or leaving it independent is a better choice. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 04:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, the fact that it's by Coetzee might possibly mean that this meets criteria #5 of WP:BK. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 09:51, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 09:40, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Here's 3 reviews [1] [2] [3]. It also seems to be mentioned in several other essays/papers on Coetzee. -- Colapeninsula ( talk) 10:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.