The result was no consensus. I note that the keep arguments are, to a very great extent, bare assertions not backed up in policy, but there is insufficient consensus to delete this article. Stifle ( talk) 08:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC) reply
As it stands, this as well as Highland Creek (Toronto) is a collection of satellite coordinates, original research, and synthesis of those two. No prejudice against recreation with ANY reliable sources. These are legitimate places, but not legitimate articles. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 22:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. I note that the keep arguments are, to a very great extent, bare assertions not backed up in policy, but there is insufficient consensus to delete this article. Stifle ( talk) 08:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC) reply
As it stands, this as well as Highland Creek (Toronto) is a collection of satellite coordinates, original research, and synthesis of those two. No prejudice against recreation with ANY reliable sources. These are legitimate places, but not legitimate articles. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 22:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply