The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Wellness Forever

Wellness Forever (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. References are routine funding news. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND, WP:SIRS. scope_creep ^Talk 08:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete That's precisely what I said when I nominated this article for AfD: "Indian pharma retail company, fails WP:NORG; WP:GNG - coverage of routine funding rounds, company announcements. No indepth coverage, no evidence of notability." were my words and I'm only delighted to repeat them here with no chance this article's AfD will again result in a 'soft close'. Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:55, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood ( talk) 10:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Alexandermcnabb: Hopefully not this time. Its all funding news and its junk. scope_creep ^Talk 12:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Scope creep: The article hasn't changed. It was one of those neglected wee AfD's that ended up as 'no consensus'. As you say - and as Don Logan tells us in Sexy Beast, not this time! Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 12:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Alexandermcnabb: This time it will dissapear underneath the concrete. scope_creep ^Talk 12:38, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:33, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Weak Delete There is an article with some analysis related to it's IPO ( cached link) which seems WP:ORGCRIT compliant and and a paragraph long summary in a book ( link), which is borderline. So I'd say its close, but not quite there in terms of meeting WP:NCORP. Jumpytoo Talk 06:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC) reply

With 161 stores for plans for 450, as a large chain you would expect an article, but the referenceing is very very poor and has only been created as an ad for the IPO, so it fails WP:NCORP, and is well with the domain of Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Crunchbase. scope_creep ^Talk 06:23, 26 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Stay I have added more reliable sources to support for undeletion. Suggesting another review. -- VKG1985 ( Talk | E-Mail | Contrib) 07:40, 26 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Its more of the same, routine business news that fails WP:CORPDEPTH, passing mentions and other run of the mill business news. Its a true brochure article and is only here because of the IPO. scope_creep ^Talk 16:12, 27 July 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete I'm unable to locate anything that isn't an announcement/PR of some type or another and nothing that meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing ⁺⁺ 18:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Not impressed by the new sources. The original arguments for deletion still hold. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 00:28, 31 July 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.