The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. sufficient consensus after relisting DGG (
talk ) 20:21, 29 December 2014 (UTC)reply
WP:ONEEVENT - this person's only claim to fame is that he was killed in an air crash. Also fails notability guidelines under
WP:MILPEOPLE as he was only a squadron leader. The crash itself might pass notability and warrant an article n which case this individual's biographical info could be included in that article. obi2canibetalkcontr 18:06, 14 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete if the article fails the aviation guideline for notable crashes (which I believe it does); military crashes have a higher standard than civilian. Fails MILPEOPLE.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 02:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep the person in question as gain much attention in the local media,
[1],
[2],
[3].
Cossde (
talk) 16:37, 15 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment. Those are just routine announcements of a crash investigation and a line or two about the president paying last respects to the officer. Wikipedia is not a newspaper, and this event has no lasting impact.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 02:42, 16 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Mid-ranking officer. No real notability. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 14:05, 17 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123(articulate) @ 21:40, 22 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails
WP:GNG. Sources do not establish notability sufficiently.
Becky Sayles (
talk) 18:25, 29 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. sufficient consensus after relisting DGG (
talk ) 20:21, 29 December 2014 (UTC)reply
WP:ONEEVENT - this person's only claim to fame is that he was killed in an air crash. Also fails notability guidelines under
WP:MILPEOPLE as he was only a squadron leader. The crash itself might pass notability and warrant an article n which case this individual's biographical info could be included in that article. obi2canibetalkcontr 18:06, 14 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete if the article fails the aviation guideline for notable crashes (which I believe it does); military crashes have a higher standard than civilian. Fails MILPEOPLE.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 02:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep the person in question as gain much attention in the local media,
[1],
[2],
[3].
Cossde (
talk) 16:37, 15 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment. Those are just routine announcements of a crash investigation and a line or two about the president paying last respects to the officer. Wikipedia is not a newspaper, and this event has no lasting impact.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 02:42, 16 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Mid-ranking officer. No real notability. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 14:05, 17 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123(articulate) @ 21:40, 22 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails
WP:GNG. Sources do not establish notability sufficiently.
Becky Sayles (
talk) 18:25, 29 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.