The result was speedy keep. withdrawn (non-admin closure) Vexations ( talk) 17:07, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Per https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests&type=revision&diff=974338287&oldid=974240310&diffmode=source, "All the information posted about waqar zaka is either wrong or fake details". So we're finding ourselves in the situation is that the subject claims that all the cited sources are wrong, but the subject himself is not a reliable source. After reviewing the sources, I am convinced that they are all celebrity gossip, and using them is a violation of WP:BLP. We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. It is not up to Zaka to prove that they are wrong, it is up to us to prove that they are right. Vexations ( talk) 13:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want me to send his official documents I can, I'm not a kid with 0 info you can confirm my identity directly by Mr Waqar Zaka — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaheryar Shabbir ( talk • contribs) 15:13, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Let's clarify something. The editor claiming to represent Zaka does not want the article deleted, they want the content changed, but they have not proposed a new text. I don't think that they want the article deleted, at least they haven't explicitly said so. It is clear that my proposal for deletion as a solution that leaves all parties equally dissatisfied (aka a compromise), has failed. I'll withdraw this AfD and close it as keep. I suggest that instead editors who are unhappy with the current text point out exactly claims are incorrect and which sources are unreliable. Category:Inline citation and verifiability dispute templates has all kinds of suitable templates. Vexations ( talk) 17:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Just an example How the hell in a world can someone tell his date of birth? His common detail is wrong which is his date of birth, There is no such document bigger than a passport which verifies his date of birth, are you guys okay? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaheryar Shabbir ( talk • contribs) 18:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. withdrawn (non-admin closure) Vexations ( talk) 17:07, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Per https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests&type=revision&diff=974338287&oldid=974240310&diffmode=source, "All the information posted about waqar zaka is either wrong or fake details". So we're finding ourselves in the situation is that the subject claims that all the cited sources are wrong, but the subject himself is not a reliable source. After reviewing the sources, I am convinced that they are all celebrity gossip, and using them is a violation of WP:BLP. We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. It is not up to Zaka to prove that they are wrong, it is up to us to prove that they are right. Vexations ( talk) 13:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want me to send his official documents I can, I'm not a kid with 0 info you can confirm my identity directly by Mr Waqar Zaka — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaheryar Shabbir ( talk • contribs) 15:13, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Let's clarify something. The editor claiming to represent Zaka does not want the article deleted, they want the content changed, but they have not proposed a new text. I don't think that they want the article deleted, at least they haven't explicitly said so. It is clear that my proposal for deletion as a solution that leaves all parties equally dissatisfied (aka a compromise), has failed. I'll withdraw this AfD and close it as keep. I suggest that instead editors who are unhappy with the current text point out exactly claims are incorrect and which sources are unreliable. Category:Inline citation and verifiability dispute templates has all kinds of suitable templates. Vexations ( talk) 17:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Just an example How the hell in a world can someone tell his date of birth? His common detail is wrong which is his date of birth, There is no such document bigger than a passport which verifies his date of birth, are you guys okay? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaheryar Shabbir ( talk • contribs) 18:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)