- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — fortuna velut luna 07:43, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Vusamazulu Credo Mutwa ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about an "author and activist" that is sourced only to the subject of the article himself. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 21:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
::We have the case of a crew of vandals in which
Thomas.W is deleting in bad-faith several articles with the intention of creating disruption. I call this an act of vandalism by a Wikipedia user who is abusing his editor's privileges.
Oficinalis (
talk)
21:56, 13 August 2017 (UTC) Comment of block evading vandal stricken.
- Keep The version of the article from 24 June, prior to editing by Oficinalis, was suitably sourced. I've reverted to that version (while retaining the AFD tag). WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep now that the article has been reverted to the stable version that existed before the sockpuppet appeared. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 17:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — fortuna velut luna 07:43, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- Vusamazulu Credo Mutwa ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about an "author and activist" that is sourced only to the subject of the article himself. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 21:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
::We have the case of a crew of vandals in which
Thomas.W is deleting in bad-faith several articles with the intention of creating disruption. I call this an act of vandalism by a Wikipedia user who is abusing his editor's privileges.
Oficinalis (
talk)
21:56, 13 August 2017 (UTC) Comment of block evading vandal stricken.
- Keep The version of the article from 24 June, prior to editing by Oficinalis, was suitably sourced. I've reverted to that version (while retaining the AFD tag). WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 11:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep now that the article has been reverted to the stable version that existed before the sockpuppet appeared. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 17:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.