The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Interview - consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing
WP:ORGIND
Interview - consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing
WP:ORGIND
This reads like a press release, despite the lack of explicit language admitting to such, and has no listed author so I'm not convinced it's reliable.
Consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing
WP:ORGIND
This looks promising, but I can't access it.
No mention of the topic I can find
WP:TOI should not be used to establish notability for companies, and in any event except for the first paragraph which doesn't satisfy
WP:CORPDEPTH this consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing
WP:ORGIND
Does not discuss the topic in sufficient depth to satisfy
WP:CORPDEPTH
Does not discuss the topic in sufficient depth to satisfy
WP:CORPDEPTH and given the tone and the lack of a listed author I'm not convinced it's reliable either.
The article itself is both from the Times and India and does not discuss the topic in sufficient depth to satisfy
WP:CORPDEPTH. The case study itself is more interesting, but does that make a reliable source?
Delete - Great source assessment. I did a spot check of the current sourcing and also a quick search online. Cannot find anything that meets
WP:ORGCRIT. Plenty of mentions, churnalism, or otherwise unreliable sourcing. Nothing that would show CORPDEPTH. --
CNMall41 (
talk)
01:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete or maybe redirect to
Medical_tourism#India. I'd put this on my to-do list because there was so much spamming going on in the general category, the sourcing looked extremely thin, and I wasn't sure how to assess the case study, but either way I don't think the case study is enough.
Valereee (
talk)
17:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Interview - consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing
WP:ORGIND
Interview - consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing
WP:ORGIND
This reads like a press release, despite the lack of explicit language admitting to such, and has no listed author so I'm not convinced it's reliable.
Consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing
WP:ORGIND
This looks promising, but I can't access it.
No mention of the topic I can find
WP:TOI should not be used to establish notability for companies, and in any event except for the first paragraph which doesn't satisfy
WP:CORPDEPTH this consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing
WP:ORGIND
Does not discuss the topic in sufficient depth to satisfy
WP:CORPDEPTH
Does not discuss the topic in sufficient depth to satisfy
WP:CORPDEPTH and given the tone and the lack of a listed author I'm not convinced it's reliable either.
The article itself is both from the Times and India and does not discuss the topic in sufficient depth to satisfy
WP:CORPDEPTH. The case study itself is more interesting, but does that make a reliable source?
Delete - Great source assessment. I did a spot check of the current sourcing and also a quick search online. Cannot find anything that meets
WP:ORGCRIT. Plenty of mentions, churnalism, or otherwise unreliable sourcing. Nothing that would show CORPDEPTH. --
CNMall41 (
talk)
01:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete or maybe redirect to
Medical_tourism#India. I'd put this on my to-do list because there was so much spamming going on in the general category, the sourcing looked extremely thin, and I wasn't sure how to assess the case study, but either way I don't think the case study is enough.
Valereee (
talk)
17:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.