- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. I am convinced by the sourcing presented in the article that this subject passes WP:GNG.
Thanks everyone for participating. Unhappy with this decision? If one wishes to renominate this article with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. I will not re-review my decision. Happy holidays. Missvain ( talk) 00:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Utsav Chakraborty ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable; does not meet WP:ENTERTAINER. DTM ( talk) 17:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy Keep. The guidelines clearly state that failure to meet WP:ENTERTAINER is not conclusive proof of failure at being notability, especially when we're considering a figure that has had more than significant in-depth coverage in multiple Reliable Sources. A cursory google search is enough to prove that. And his failure at WP:ENTERTAINER is shaky at best given his significant roles and writing credits in multiple All India Bakchod productions, in productions for Vice, and on Comedy Central, but not that any of that should matter because his notability is very easy to prove. LΞVIXIUS 💬 05:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete it if you want Pulakit. Ketlag ( talk) 02:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
19:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems to pass the
WP:GNG based on the several sources covering controversial elements of his life. SNGs are an alternative to the GNG except
WP:NCORP and if an entity passes the main notability criteria it doesn't matter if they fail a secondary one.
Chess (
talk) (please use
{{ reply to|Chess}}on reply) 21:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. I am convinced by the sourcing presented in the article that this subject passes WP:GNG.
Thanks everyone for participating. Unhappy with this decision? If one wishes to renominate this article with another policy-based rationale, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. I will not re-review my decision. Happy holidays. Missvain ( talk) 00:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Utsav Chakraborty ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable; does not meet WP:ENTERTAINER. DTM ( talk) 17:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy Keep. The guidelines clearly state that failure to meet WP:ENTERTAINER is not conclusive proof of failure at being notability, especially when we're considering a figure that has had more than significant in-depth coverage in multiple Reliable Sources. A cursory google search is enough to prove that. And his failure at WP:ENTERTAINER is shaky at best given his significant roles and writing credits in multiple All India Bakchod productions, in productions for Vice, and on Comedy Central, but not that any of that should matter because his notability is very easy to prove. LΞVIXIUS 💬 05:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete it if you want Pulakit. Ketlag ( talk) 02:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
19:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems to pass the
WP:GNG based on the several sources covering controversial elements of his life. SNGs are an alternative to the GNG except
WP:NCORP and if an entity passes the main notability criteria it doesn't matter if they fail a secondary one.
Chess (
talk) (please use
{{ reply to|Chess}}on reply) 21:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.