The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
And in return, maybe you and your friends could remove the topic ban you unjustly put on me..., that would save everyone from poorly edited pages, which have been rife recently...
JRRobinson (
talk)
14:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)reply
G7 doesn't apply as they aren't the only contributor. I don't agree that the 30 intermediate edits are small enough to warrant a G7, so we can just see out the AfD. Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)14:45, 21 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Consensus was against lifting the topic ban @
JRRobinson when it was just brought to a 3rd discussion. It has nothing to do with "friends" and I suggest you drop the stick or you're going to end up with a broader ban. @
Lee Vilenski that's a surprising conclusion?
This is the difference in content. Either way, apologies for giving you wrong information on that @
JRRobinsonStarMississippi15:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)reply
G7 isn't really designed for an article history of 15 years. It shouldn't matter waiting a couple days. I'd recommend dropping the stick with your topic ban JRRobinson. Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)15:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
And in return, maybe you and your friends could remove the topic ban you unjustly put on me..., that would save everyone from poorly edited pages, which have been rife recently...
JRRobinson (
talk)
14:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)reply
G7 doesn't apply as they aren't the only contributor. I don't agree that the 30 intermediate edits are small enough to warrant a G7, so we can just see out the AfD. Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)14:45, 21 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Consensus was against lifting the topic ban @
JRRobinson when it was just brought to a 3rd discussion. It has nothing to do with "friends" and I suggest you drop the stick or you're going to end up with a broader ban. @
Lee Vilenski that's a surprising conclusion?
This is the difference in content. Either way, apologies for giving you wrong information on that @
JRRobinsonStarMississippi15:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)reply
G7 isn't really designed for an article history of 15 years. It shouldn't matter waiting a couple days. I'd recommend dropping the stick with your topic ban JRRobinson. Lee Vilenski(
talk •
contribs)15:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.