The result was no consensus. I think it can safely be said that the topic as such is probably notable but the content needs work to comply with WP:NOR and WP:NPOV. Sandstein 07:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Original research. The author is using Wikipedia to expand on his views presented at his own website. The use of many references should detract from the fact that the author is drawing his own conclusions. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 19:26, 11 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The author is also not computer savvy and open to any suggestions on cleanup, organization, or other suggestions to better neutrality. The author is currently trying to update the page to many references to these books. Each number in the work corresponds to a reference which has not yet been entered. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.193.44.50 ( talk) 19:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. I think it can safely be said that the topic as such is probably notable but the content needs work to comply with WP:NOR and WP:NPOV. Sandstein 07:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Original research. The author is using Wikipedia to expand on his views presented at his own website. The use of many references should detract from the fact that the author is drawing his own conclusions. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 19:26, 11 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The author is also not computer savvy and open to any suggestions on cleanup, organization, or other suggestions to better neutrality. The author is currently trying to update the page to many references to these books. Each number in the work corresponds to a reference which has not yet been entered. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.193.44.50 ( talk) 19:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC) reply