From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Universal Health Services. (Similar to a soft-delete, due to low participation this could be considered a soft-redirect.) Daniel ( talk) 16:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply

UBH Denton

UBH Denton (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No results on news or google search. Source 5 is the only listed source with independent, reliable significant coverage. It would seem the confidential nature of the complaints has made it hard to get news coverage about the facility. Regarding the other sources: 1 and 2 aren't loading for me and don't seem independent from the titles. 3 is a google search. 4 is not a reliable source as it is a blog/forum. 6 does not mention the facility by name in the abstract or citations, and was published in 2006 when the facility only opened in 2005 so it is unlikely to have significant coverage of this particular facility. Since creation the article has consistently had in-body external links and POV editing, albeit low volume. Darcyisverycute ( talk) 10:50, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Universal Health Services. (Similar to a soft-delete, due to low participation this could be considered a soft-redirect.) Daniel ( talk) 16:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply

UBH Denton

UBH Denton (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No results on news or google search. Source 5 is the only listed source with independent, reliable significant coverage. It would seem the confidential nature of the complaints has made it hard to get news coverage about the facility. Regarding the other sources: 1 and 2 aren't loading for me and don't seem independent from the titles. 3 is a google search. 4 is not a reliable source as it is a blog/forum. 6 does not mention the facility by name in the abstract or citations, and was published in 2006 when the facility only opened in 2005 so it is unlikely to have significant coverage of this particular facility. Since creation the article has consistently had in-body external links and POV editing, albeit low volume. Darcyisverycute ( talk) 10:50, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook