The result was no consensus. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Very short lived group. Less than two links to this stub. Released only one single on indie label, which did not chart, before band folded. Whether this is enough here for it's own seperate article, let alone a stub is questionable NorthShoreJames ( talk) 03:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC) reply
"A musician or ensemble... is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria 1. "It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable."
(there is no need to look at the secondary basis duffbeerforme cites below, needed only where the primary standard is in question). Certainly this is not the most notable subject imaginable (to use notability in the vernacular sense, which we long ago departed from for our use here), but it does meet our standards for inclusion. I am fairly uninterested in the subject; I was just passing by doing newpages patrol when I came across the invalid speedy tag and declined, but I bet I could source this further If I had a mind to.--
Fuhghettaboutit (
talk) 01:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result was no consensus. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Very short lived group. Less than two links to this stub. Released only one single on indie label, which did not chart, before band folded. Whether this is enough here for it's own seperate article, let alone a stub is questionable NorthShoreJames ( talk) 03:10, 4 January 2009 (UTC) reply
"A musician or ensemble... is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria 1. "It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable."
(there is no need to look at the secondary basis duffbeerforme cites below, needed only where the primary standard is in question). Certainly this is not the most notable subject imaginable (to use notability in the vernacular sense, which we long ago departed from for our use here), but it does meet our standards for inclusion. I am fairly uninterested in the subject; I was just passing by doing newpages patrol when I came across the invalid speedy tag and declined, but I bet I could source this further If I had a mind to.--
Fuhghettaboutit (
talk) 01:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
reply