- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 20:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Tricia Raikes ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Everything here is mentions or PR. no evidence for notability DGG ( talk ) 20:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as searches simply found nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 05:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - I found plenty of references to her in news articles. Blythwood ( talk) 04:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - plenty of news article refs are available. Clearly falls under wp:GNG.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 17:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, nice source coverage, including at Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. — Cirt ( talk) 20:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GNG. Article could use expansion, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson ( talk) 20:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep but a weak one, didn't find that much coverage of her, but the White House blurb and the power of the charity seems to push me into the keep column.-- Tomwsulcer ( talk) 21:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 20:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Tricia Raikes ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Everything here is mentions or PR. no evidence for notability DGG ( talk ) 20:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as searches simply found nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 05:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 00:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - I found plenty of references to her in news articles. Blythwood ( talk) 04:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - plenty of news article refs are available. Clearly falls under wp:GNG.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 17:50, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, nice source coverage, including at Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. — Cirt ( talk) 20:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GNG. Article could use expansion, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson ( talk) 20:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep but a weak one, didn't find that much coverage of her, but the White House blurb and the power of the charity seems to push me into the keep column.-- Tomwsulcer ( talk) 21:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.