The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. the arguing around the redirect hasn't overshadowed the fact that the arguments about the sourcing not cutting the mustard have not been refuted
SpartazHumbug!13:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Up-and-coming creative ensemble generating some momentum, but
Wikipedia:Too soon to meet inclusion per
WP:BAND. Sources found are mostly
WP:UGC. The review by Eden 2014 is independent in an online magazine, but I'm not sure that is sufficient. They have a respectable Facebook following and may be appropriate for Wikipedia soon, but...
WP:CRYSTAL.
Gaff (
talk)
02:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment Thanks for your help, but the band should be placed in
parentheses. I have restored the page content and
redirected the
namespace to the
band correctly (see above), but kept the {{R from move}} template(s).
ITfan1990 (
talk)
That was a cut-and-paste move, and I have just history-merged it and put the article back at
Traumatomy, where it should remain until this discussion has been settled. Is this discussion about deleting or moving the music band article, or about deleting the redirection? AfD is not the place to discuss deleting a redirection.
Anthony Appleyard (
talk)
15:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the histmerge, but the article clearly doesn't belong there per AfD discussion at this time. As stated above, the band name should be listed in parentheses for now. This time I added a
complex histmerge tag, also explaining the naming policy mentioned move. Please be aware of it.
ITfan1990 (
talk)
19:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete- Subject fails on
WP:GNG and
WP:BAND. Google search emits facebook, twitter and other music indexing sites. At the moment this band does not qualify for a Wikipedia page, but they will definitely in coming months.
Hitro talk18:09, 4 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment- It is clearly mentioned in the notice that "article should not be blanked" but it is blanked for like 24 hours now, it is an AfD discussion, it is a 'keep' or 'delete' debate. We should emphasize on basic rules.
Hitro talk19:00, 5 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment: there is no AfD notice on the page for the band, which is today at
Traumatomy (band) (I found it while stub-sorting
Category:Stubs), but there is an AfD notice at the redirect for
Traumatomy. While this AfD stays open, there should be an AfD notice on the article itself. Could a passing admin (@
Anthony Appleyard:?) perhaps sort this out?
PamD15:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment See above. Stop trying to
revert the histmerge that was agreed upon here. Please do not remove the tag again without a valid reason. Thank you.
ITfan1990 (
talk)
21:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Relisting comment: I've removed the deletion notice from the redirect to the article. To closing admin - if delete, please delete both
Traumatomy (band) and
Traumatomy.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Deryck C.07:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. the arguing around the redirect hasn't overshadowed the fact that the arguments about the sourcing not cutting the mustard have not been refuted
SpartazHumbug!13:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Up-and-coming creative ensemble generating some momentum, but
Wikipedia:Too soon to meet inclusion per
WP:BAND. Sources found are mostly
WP:UGC. The review by Eden 2014 is independent in an online magazine, but I'm not sure that is sufficient. They have a respectable Facebook following and may be appropriate for Wikipedia soon, but...
WP:CRYSTAL.
Gaff (
talk)
02:47, 3 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment Thanks for your help, but the band should be placed in
parentheses. I have restored the page content and
redirected the
namespace to the
band correctly (see above), but kept the {{R from move}} template(s).
ITfan1990 (
talk)
That was a cut-and-paste move, and I have just history-merged it and put the article back at
Traumatomy, where it should remain until this discussion has been settled. Is this discussion about deleting or moving the music band article, or about deleting the redirection? AfD is not the place to discuss deleting a redirection.
Anthony Appleyard (
talk)
15:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the histmerge, but the article clearly doesn't belong there per AfD discussion at this time. As stated above, the band name should be listed in parentheses for now. This time I added a
complex histmerge tag, also explaining the naming policy mentioned move. Please be aware of it.
ITfan1990 (
talk)
19:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete- Subject fails on
WP:GNG and
WP:BAND. Google search emits facebook, twitter and other music indexing sites. At the moment this band does not qualify for a Wikipedia page, but they will definitely in coming months.
Hitro talk18:09, 4 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment- It is clearly mentioned in the notice that "article should not be blanked" but it is blanked for like 24 hours now, it is an AfD discussion, it is a 'keep' or 'delete' debate. We should emphasize on basic rules.
Hitro talk19:00, 5 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment: there is no AfD notice on the page for the band, which is today at
Traumatomy (band) (I found it while stub-sorting
Category:Stubs), but there is an AfD notice at the redirect for
Traumatomy. While this AfD stays open, there should be an AfD notice on the article itself. Could a passing admin (@
Anthony Appleyard:?) perhaps sort this out?
PamD15:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment See above. Stop trying to
revert the histmerge that was agreed upon here. Please do not remove the tag again without a valid reason. Thank you.
ITfan1990 (
talk)
21:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Relisting comment: I've removed the deletion notice from the redirect to the article. To closing admin - if delete, please delete both
Traumatomy (band) and
Traumatomy.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Deryck C.07:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.