- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Trash Inc: The Secret Life of Garbage
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Trash Inc: The Secret Life of Garbage ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable television film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY 2008 01:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete does not meet NFILM. Anonymous 7481 ( talk) 15:17, 4 July 2021 (UTC)- Changing to keep per the reviews from 👨x🐱 (HumanxAnthro). Seems like a lack of research on my part. Anonymous 7481 ( talk) 13:41, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
*Delete Fails
WP:NFILM
Donaldd23 (
talk) 18:54, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. Reviewed in The Los Angeles Times and Huffpost, plus found a few books citing the documentary. 👨x🐱 ( talk) 21:11, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per the significant coverage linked above including The Los Angeles Times, Huffington Post as well as book coverage, passes WP:GNG imv, Atlantic306 ( talk) 01:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Trash Inc: The Secret Life of Garbage
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Trash Inc: The Secret Life of Garbage ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable television film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY 2008 01:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete does not meet NFILM. Anonymous 7481 ( talk) 15:17, 4 July 2021 (UTC)- Changing to keep per the reviews from 👨x🐱 (HumanxAnthro). Seems like a lack of research on my part. Anonymous 7481 ( talk) 13:41, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
*Delete Fails
WP:NFILM
Donaldd23 (
talk) 18:54, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. Reviewed in The Los Angeles Times and Huffpost, plus found a few books citing the documentary. 👨x🐱 ( talk) 21:11, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per the significant coverage linked above including The Los Angeles Times, Huffington Post as well as book coverage, passes WP:GNG imv, Atlantic306 ( talk) 01:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.