- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:47, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Torsten Bell
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Torsten Bell ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable civil servant - Mooonswimmer 14:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and England. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:54, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This article includes many citations from news coverage in national papers. Easily passes WP:GNG. QuintinK ( talk) 02:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Director of a notable think tank, together with the other sources already present prove notability. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆ transmissions∆ ° co-ords° 22:39, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)- Notability proved beyond all reasonable doubt, must be kept. LvivForev ( talk) 17:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per above contributors. His role at Resolution Foundation is what merits the entry (alongside his career in the civil service). I'm surprised that the article is, however, as short as it is; there are a lot of sources out there about him with a lot more information, even in the first page of results of a Google search. _ MB190417_ ( talk) 10:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Sometimes, editors can disagree reasonably, but looking at the article now, it's an easy keep. Bearian ( talk) 16:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:47, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Torsten Bell
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Torsten Bell ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable civil servant - Mooonswimmer 14:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and England. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:54, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This article includes many citations from news coverage in national papers. Easily passes WP:GNG. QuintinK ( talk) 02:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Director of a notable think tank, together with the other sources already present prove notability. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆ transmissions∆ ° co-ords° 22:39, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)- Notability proved beyond all reasonable doubt, must be kept. LvivForev ( talk) 17:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per above contributors. His role at Resolution Foundation is what merits the entry (alongside his career in the civil service). I'm surprised that the article is, however, as short as it is; there are a lot of sources out there about him with a lot more information, even in the first page of results of a Google search. _ MB190417_ ( talk) 10:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Sometimes, editors can disagree reasonably, but looking at the article now, it's an easy keep. Bearian ( talk) 16:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.