The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep per
WP:PROF#C1 with a SCOPUS h-index of 53 for 143 publications
[1], and 28 publications with over 200 citations each on Google Scholar.
XOR'easter (
talk) 18:43, 24 January 2018 (UTC)reply
That's nice and all, but are there any sources about him aside from those published by his own university? If there's no information available, you can't write an article.
Natureium (
talk) 19:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. Most of his publications have group author lists (not unusual in this area of science), but he has several first-author papers having >300 citations each. This is a conclusive pass of PROF c1. Regarding sources about him, the published papers are RS and give enough information for a short article (institutions, research area, etc). This is the case with numerous existing WP science BLPs.
Agricola44 (
talk) 19:56, 24 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:PROF#C1 and the highly cited first-author publications identified above. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 22:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep -- meets
WP:PROF & "coauthored the second edition of the textbook Human Evolutionary Genetics". Sufficient for a stub-class article.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 23:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep on the basis of impact factor per
WP:PROF, however, article needs improvement, specifically removal of external links in body.
Chetsford (
talk) 17:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep per
WP:PROF#C1 with a SCOPUS h-index of 53 for 143 publications
[1], and 28 publications with over 200 citations each on Google Scholar.
XOR'easter (
talk) 18:43, 24 January 2018 (UTC)reply
That's nice and all, but are there any sources about him aside from those published by his own university? If there's no information available, you can't write an article.
Natureium (
talk) 19:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. Most of his publications have group author lists (not unusual in this area of science), but he has several first-author papers having >300 citations each. This is a conclusive pass of PROF c1. Regarding sources about him, the published papers are RS and give enough information for a short article (institutions, research area, etc). This is the case with numerous existing WP science BLPs.
Agricola44 (
talk) 19:56, 24 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:PROF#C1 and the highly cited first-author publications identified above. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 22:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep -- meets
WP:PROF & "coauthored the second edition of the textbook Human Evolutionary Genetics". Sufficient for a stub-class article.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 23:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep on the basis of impact factor per
WP:PROF, however, article needs improvement, specifically removal of external links in body.
Chetsford (
talk) 17:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.