The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No claim of notability, no reference that he even exists or is important
Planetscared (
talk) 02:40, 13 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete, unsourced BLP with no real claim to notability.
Hairhorn (
talk) 02:45, 13 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete, violates
WP:BIO and
WP:GNG. No reliable and third-party references that I could find. Some self-published work, but that fails
WP:RS.
DubiousIronyyell 03:08, 13 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No claim of notability, no reference that he even exists or is important
Planetscared (
talk) 02:40, 13 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete, unsourced BLP with no real claim to notability.
Hairhorn (
talk) 02:45, 13 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete, violates
WP:BIO and
WP:GNG. No reliable and third-party references that I could find. Some self-published work, but that fails
WP:RS.
DubiousIronyyell 03:08, 13 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.