The result was No Consensus defaulting to Keep, disagreement over his notability, suggest sources quoted in this debate are added to the article. Davewild ( talk) 12:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC) reply
procedural nomination— article version at time of AFD: This was deleted in 2006 via AFD. It is not eligible for deletion under WP:CSD#G4 as content has changed somewhat. PROD nominator states "No evidence that the player meets notability criteria for sportspeople as laid down at WP:BIO". Personally, I think Pekhart might barely pass the notability threshold now but could not in 2006, but it would not have been appropriate for me to decline the PROD given a prior AFD (under present policy). User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 05:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was No Consensus defaulting to Keep, disagreement over his notability, suggest sources quoted in this debate are added to the article. Davewild ( talk) 12:06, 31 December 2007 (UTC) reply
procedural nomination— article version at time of AFD: This was deleted in 2006 via AFD. It is not eligible for deletion under WP:CSD#G4 as content has changed somewhat. PROD nominator states "No evidence that the player meets notability criteria for sportspeople as laid down at WP:BIO". Personally, I think Pekhart might barely pass the notability threshold now but could not in 2006, but it would not have been appropriate for me to decline the PROD given a prior AFD (under present policy). User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 05:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply