- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 01:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Tofutti ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
this is a promotion of the company which violates WP:NOTADVERTISING Jonnymoon96 ( talk) 21:00, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep well-known and popular food company geared towards vegetarians. Google & Google News search indicates WP:GNG met. Article could use improved referencing, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson ( talk) 22:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- It's easy to say that, but could we see some sources? Google news search gives a lot of routine and machine-generated stories but not much proper journalistic reporting with meaningful information. The cited article is fine, but it's only one piece. -- Colapeninsula ( talk) 10:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The company is notable, with ample sources about the company available from The New York Times and other sources. Any perception of advertising and promotion can be better solved by editing, not deletion. Alansohn ( talk) 03:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Comment – I performed some copy editing to address concerns with promotional tone. The article now reads neutrally, in my opinion. North America 1000 01:31, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 01:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Tofutti ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
this is a promotion of the company which violates WP:NOTADVERTISING Jonnymoon96 ( talk) 21:00, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep well-known and popular food company geared towards vegetarians. Google & Google News search indicates WP:GNG met. Article could use improved referencing, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson ( talk) 22:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- It's easy to say that, but could we see some sources? Google news search gives a lot of routine and machine-generated stories but not much proper journalistic reporting with meaningful information. The cited article is fine, but it's only one piece. -- Colapeninsula ( talk) 10:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The company is notable, with ample sources about the company available from The New York Times and other sources. Any perception of advertising and promotion can be better solved by editing, not deletion. Alansohn ( talk) 03:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Comment – I performed some copy editing to address concerns with promotional tone. The article now reads neutrally, in my opinion. North America 1000 01:31, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.