- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Todd Stephenson ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 17:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 17:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 17:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – XboxGamer22408 talk 02:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – XboxGamer22408 talk 02:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Keep. Played in a top-level league ( Australian Ice Hockey League), making him pass WP:NHOCKEY #1. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 08:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Striking my !vote because of the comment below. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 04:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: No sources found in searches or used in the article that indicate this player passes GNG. Since the last time this was nominated, NHOCKEY has become more strict in its criteria as it was found that the 2011 version had many players that did not meet GNG (with this appearing to be one of them). It used to be just the senior national team, but now it is a top level division senior national team playing for the actual world championship, not the second or third tier trying to earn their way into that division. @ Anarchyte: please read NHOCKEY#1 again, it says: "Played one or more games in an existing or defunct top professional league", not Played one or more games in an existing or defunct top professional league in a country/nation. (Also the AIHL is not professional league, it is an amateur league). Yosemiter ( talk) 19:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- @ Yosemiter: Ah, my apologies for the misunderstanding. I've stricken my !vote above. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 04:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Deadman137 ( talk) 04:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Todd Stephenson ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 17:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 17:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 17:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – XboxGamer22408 talk 02:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – XboxGamer22408 talk 02:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Keep. Played in a top-level league ( Australian Ice Hockey League), making him pass WP:NHOCKEY #1. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 08:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Striking my !vote because of the comment below. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 04:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: No sources found in searches or used in the article that indicate this player passes GNG. Since the last time this was nominated, NHOCKEY has become more strict in its criteria as it was found that the 2011 version had many players that did not meet GNG (with this appearing to be one of them). It used to be just the senior national team, but now it is a top level division senior national team playing for the actual world championship, not the second or third tier trying to earn their way into that division. @ Anarchyte: please read NHOCKEY#1 again, it says: "Played one or more games in an existing or defunct top professional league", not Played one or more games in an existing or defunct top professional league in a country/nation. (Also the AIHL is not professional league, it is an amateur league). Yosemiter ( talk) 19:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- @ Yosemiter: Ah, my apologies for the misunderstanding. I've stricken my !vote above. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 04:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Deadman137 ( talk) 04:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.