The result was no consensus. for deletion. Disagreement over notability and whether sources are sufficient to establish notability. Davewild ( talk) 11:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No indication that this article meets WP:NOTE or WP:BIO. Of the 17 references at time of nomination, 16 are clearly not independent (3 are to the agency representing Friel, 3 are to pieces written by Friel himself and 10 to mentions by organisations for whom Friel has performed/spoken/written) and 1 is to a blog entry (unreliable and unacceptable per WP:BLP) I am also nominating related article Wretched with Todd Friel for deletion. Hrafn Talk Stalk 05:16, 15 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. for deletion. Disagreement over notability and whether sources are sufficient to establish notability. Davewild ( talk) 11:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No indication that this article meets WP:NOTE or WP:BIO. Of the 17 references at time of nomination, 16 are clearly not independent (3 are to the agency representing Friel, 3 are to pieces written by Friel himself and 10 to mentions by organisations for whom Friel has performed/spoken/written) and 1 is to a blog entry (unreliable and unacceptable per WP:BLP) I am also nominating related article Wretched with Todd Friel for deletion. Hrafn Talk Stalk 05:16, 15 December 2008 (UTC) reply